I know that these noble people exist and that's why I made sure not to generalise in my earlier statement.Fusion said:Thought Arumpnoo8 might not be an Indian, you can find those qualities in many CW members. Jono, Pratyush, SJS, Sanz are just a few that come to mind right now. There are others. Of course there are trolls as well, but as SJS once advised me, just ignore them and they'll go away (I sometimes fail to follow this advice). I'm a Pakistani BTW, just to add perspective.
I notice I didn't get a look-in.honestbharani said:Thanks for the mention.
I thought I was unbiased.
You'd sound really full of yourself if you hadn't been browsing this forum for 3 years under 'Armadillo'.danish said:I know that these noble people exist and that's why I made sure not to generalise in my earlier statement.
I thought Arumpnoo was Indian because in an earlier post, I thought he referred to Indians as 'my countrymen'. I must have misinterpreted the quote.
Btw, this new guy Ramu seems an interesting prospect for world peace.
India may have a good ODI record of recent but ton paper Pakistan look so much stronger than India, for me like the last series in 2004, the fact that Pakistan one the test series means they can really hurt India in the one-dayers...Nishant said:India will win and im sure of it. We are in form in the one day arena and we have a lot of youngsters such as Raina, Sreesanth etc that can help in terms of fielding.
Dhoni and sehwag will hopefully perform and lead the indians to victory
ok maybe India top 2 are a better than Pakistan's but thats only a little area where India are better than Pakistan, everything else, bowling, middle-order, all-rounders pakistan have a huge edge.Nishant said:i understand what ur saying but i still think that india have a betta chance. On paper, we have players that are better than the pakistani players. eg. sehwag is betta than Butt, Tendulkar is betta than farhat, Dhoni and akmal and Dravid v Inzamam are as good as each other.
In terms of all rounders, pathan is showing good qualities with da bat and so comparing him with Razzaq would put pathan ahead. So, yes pakistan are strong on paper but india are as good,if not better.
You forgot about Afridi, Yousif, Shoaib, and Rana.Nishant said:i understand what ur saying but i still think that india have a betta chance. On paper, we have players that are better than the pakistani players. eg. sehwag is betta than Butt, Tendulkar is betta than farhat, Dhoni and akmal and Dravid v Inzamam are as good as each other.
In terms of all rounders, pathan is showing good qualities with da bat and so comparing him with Razzaq would put pathan ahead. So, yes pakistan are strong on paper but india are as good,if not better.
these player to player comparisons don't mean a whole lot in a team game as has been proved again and again....Nishant said:i understand what ur saying but i still think that india have a betta chance. On paper, we have players that are better than the pakistani players. eg. sehwag is betta than Butt, Tendulkar is betta than farhat, Dhoni and akmal and Dravid v Inzamam are as good as each other.
In terms of all rounders, pathan is showing good qualities with da bat and so comparing him with Razzaq would put pathan ahead. So, yes pakistan are strong on paper but india are as good,if not better.
Really, that's immensely spurious. Farhat is far from a regular in the Pakistan side.Nishant said:i understand what ur saying but i still think that india have a betta chance. On paper, we have players that are better than the pakistani players. eg. sehwag is betta than Butt, Tendulkar is betta than farhat, Dhoni and akmal and Dravid v Inzamam are as good as each other.
In terms of all rounders, pathan is showing good qualities with da bat and so comparing him with Razzaq would put pathan ahead. So, yes pakistan are strong on paper but india are as good,if not better.
In matches like these between two talent-abundant teams in India & Pakistan, who both have so many game-changers ... Sehwag, Tendulkar, Dhoni, Inzamam, Afridi, Akhtar ... you can say all that you want about how the teams match up on paper, but it won't mean much. This match is tough to predict; if Sreesanth plays he could well end up becoming the new "difference-maker". That's how unpredictable it is.Nishant said:i agree that cricket is game that depends on teamwork like most sports. But, it is also true that certain individuals can change the whole scenario of the game in less than an hour, especially in one day cricket. For example, a quick fire 30 or 40 runs of 15-20 balls from a player like dhoni or afridi could change the game. It is because of this that players such as sehwag, Dhoni, Afridi, Tendulkar are feared by most teams in the world
Perhaps Inzy's doing better in the recent past, but nonetheless HERESY!Neil Pickup said:Inzamam > Tendulkar
Or maybe they should be rewarded by sending them over to India to learn as to how pitches are really made!sheerindianspeed said:AS such i don't see a very bright future for Pakistan team, however i do see a very bright future for the Pakistani grounds men, some of whome might even end up being an M.N.A in national assembly for the great services rendered to the national team, by enabling them to overcome a better team in India by preparing mind blowing wkts!
Pathan is better than Razzak in bowling while Razzak is slightly better than Ptahn in batting.Overall, Pathan has an edge and is a better player to bet on.Neil Pickup said:I'd be more looking at Inzamam > Tendulkar. And Pathan is not even close to Razzaq as an all rounder. And you forget the entirety of the pace attack. And Afridi. And Akmal is far better with the gloves.