My goodness. You've derived an awful lot of information from one still picture.Banana is eaten by monkeys. Tendulkar is clearly referring to Monkey gate which is unrelated to this test.
**** off. I never thought you were such an idiot. WTF? bananas are eaten by monkeys? only monkeys? and worse, contrived to get inside Tendulkar's mind and find out tendulkar intended to remind him of the incident? How ****ing ********!!!Banana is eaten by monkeys. Tendulkar is clearly referring to Monkey gate which is unrelated to this test.
So it's not clear at all. Good-o.I think he is.
It's clear where I am concerned. It could have been any fruit. Why only banana. My last word on the topic.So it's not clear at all. Good-o.
Yeah, sorry about that - forgot forums were a place where people don't post more than one post on a thread. Who needs debate anyway, eh?My last word on the topic.
Debates can only occur when two parties are willing to debate a topic. Not every thing on the forum is debatable where every one is concerned. I think it is clear so it is not debatable where I am concerned. No use going on about it from me.Yeah, sorry about that - forgot forums were a place where people don't post more than one post on a thread. Who needs debate anyway, eh?
That is unacceptable. You need to stop.**** off. I never thought you were such an idiot. WTF? bananas are eaten by monkeys? only monkeys? and worse, contrived to get inside Tendulkar's mind and find out tendulkar intended to remind him of the incident? How ****ing ********!!!
Because bananas are what cricketers eat when they're on the field....It's clear where I am concerned. It could have been any fruit. Why only banana.
Because it was the only one he had on him at the time?It's clear where I am concerned. It could have been any fruit. Why only banana. My last word on the topic.
From Telegraph India:
It may be just in jest but it is an unrequired gesture from Tendulkar. He doesn't need to be the man who opens a can of worms. Let the performances do the talking which they are doing mighty well for India right now.
Banana is eaten by monkeys. Tendulkar is clearly referring to Monkey gate which is unrelated to this test.
You see mate, what it means to criticize The God. You can understand what I went through when I did that ( fairly or unfairly).Debates can only occur when two parties are willing to debate a topic. Not every thing on the forum is debatable where every one is concerned. I think it is clear so it is not debatable where I am concerned. No use going on about it from me.
Ok. Tone was bad. Apologies Pratters. But the idea was so scandalously stupid which elicited the heat of the moment reply.That is unacceptable. You need to stop.
Some things you debated you have been proven wrong and I right though. Can't play in pressure situations - Can't play in pressure situations in the seccond inning of an ODI - Cricinfo - 1st Final: Australia v India at Sydney, Mar 2, 2008You see mate, what it means to criticize The God. You can understand what I went through when I did that ( fairly or unfairly).
Ofcourse, I agree that I was unfair at times but even at times I was trying to do a fair criticism, it was not easy.Some things you debated you have been proven wrong and I right though. Can't play in pressure situations - Can't play in pressure situations in the seccond inning of an ODI - Cricinfo - 1st Final: Australia v India at Sydney, Mar 2, 2008
Yeah I know what you mean mate.Ofcourse, I agree that I was unfair at times but even at times I was trying to do a fair criticism, it was not easy.
I don't see how you can connect all these dots to the monkeygate episode.From Telegraph India:
It may be just in jest but it is an unrequired gesture from Tendulkar. He doesn't need to be the man who opens a can of worms. Let the performances do the talking which they are doing mighty well for India right now.