Captain Cricket
State Vice-Captain
Any predictions on what score India will be dismissed for? I'm guessing 330 if the tail-enders pull things together.
I never argued that Clark took any 6-fers, I argued that he did fine to pick up wickets whilst bowling with McGrath and Warne. The post that I quoted didn't even mention 6-fers.Greg then proceeded to say that Clark did fine, when he doesn't have any 6-fers either IIRC, which means his point is stupid.
Average was never brought into it.
The post you quoted was addressing that point though, as he'd quoted Craig's post making the original observation. ffs.I never argued that Clark took any 6-fers, I argued that he did fine to pick up wickets whilst bowling with McGrath and Warne. The post that I quoted didn't even mention 6-fers.
Regardless of whether he's taken 6-fer's or not, Clark has been able to take wickets when bowling alongside McGrath and Warne whereas Lee has had less success despite the excuse being that Warne and McGrath as so good that he doesn't get much of a chance.The post you quoted was addressing that point though, as he'd quoted Craig's post making the original observation. ffs.
So you're going to quote a post about something, then argue something completely different to what it's addressing? Smart move, Einstein.Regardless of whether he's taken 6-fer's or not, Clark has been able to take wickets when bowling alongside McGrath and Warne whereas Lee has had less success despite the excuse being that Warne and McGrath as so good that he doesn't get much of a chance.
Craig posted that he found it hard to believe Lee didn't have any 6 wicket hauls yet. Sideshowtim then made the point that Lee would've found it hard when competing for wikcets with McGrath and Warne. I quoted sideshowtim and posted that Clark and MacGill had no trouble in picking up wickets when bowling with McGrath and Warne. The fact that Clark has no 6-fer's is somewhat beside the point, because he's still managed to pick up his fair share of wickets bowling with McGrath and Warne.So you're going to quote a post about something, then argue something completely different to what it's addressing? Smart move, Einstein.
360 - 370 for mineAny predictions on what score India will be dismissed for? I'm guessing 330 if the tail-enders pull things together.
I'm not arguing against your point, all I'm pointing out is that SST made an extremely valid point as to why Lee doesn't have any 5+ hauls, and used it completely out of context just because you don't like him. You could've quoted one of the multiple posts after SST's making the same point as you.Craig posted that he found it hard to believe Lee didn't have any 6 wicket hauls yet. Sideshowtim then made the point that Lee would've found it hard when competing for wikcets with McGrath and Warne. I quoted sideshowtim and posted that Clark and MacGill had no trouble in picking up wickets when bowling with McGrath and Warne. The fact that Clark has no 6-fer's is somewhat beside the point, because he's still managed to pick up his fair share of wickets bowling with McGrath and Warne.
Fair point. Will leave it at that.I'm not arguing against your point, all I'm pointing out is that SST made an extremely valid point as to why Lee doesn't have any 5+ hauls, and used it completely out of context just because you don't like him. You could've quoted one of the multiple posts after SST's making the same point as you.
Yeah but some batting orders orders begin at 3 and end at 4. Its all negligible really.Maybe thats because the Indian batting line virtually begins at 3 and ends at 6 (or began at 2 and ended at 5 in the last two test matches). As an Indian mate of mine said last night after watching the days play "A billion hopes on four poor souls - you cant expect them to come off big every single time. Its too much to ask".