honestbharani
Whatever it takes!!!
yeah, it is but again, Sachin seemed closest to what was said compared to the others... And from what I read first, they had Ponting, Gilchrist, their coach, manager and Symonds and Rajput, Sridhar, Sachin, Kumble and Harbhajan in the hearing... Given that the coach and managers won't really know what actually happened, and neither would Kumble, it is simply a matter of Sachin's word vs Ponting and Gilchrist. How can Procter be sure that their version is right when the Indians seem adamant that their version is right too? Too many questions and too much doubt to take such a big decision on, IMO...Can't be bothered going back to search for the direct quote, honestbharani, but it isn't simply Tendulkar's word versus Ponting's. It was three of them testifying to have heard the comment, from memory.
Agree with the poster whom said that a fine may have been the better option, although would this have been possible? It may be (not sure) that the minimum penalty might have been matches?
Also, I thought it was Chris Broad who made that comment about treating Australians and subcontinent teams differently with regards to sledging, but that is just from memory. May well be wrong.
And I am almost 100% sure that it was Procter who said it. Will try to google it out...