duffer
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
You could employ competent umpires to handle the technology.We can't ensure anything, the third umpire decision with the stumping proved that. A third umpire gives someone not out and the arguments continue.
You could employ competent umpires to handle the technology.We can't ensure anything, the third umpire decision with the stumping proved that. A third umpire gives someone not out and the arguments continue.
It was pretty conclusive according to me from what I saw. You can argue that I didn't have the view of the umpire but I didn't see any part of the foot behind the line and you have to have part of the foot behind the line for a ball to be legitimate. I guess we will have to agree to disagree.I thought the Lee ball to Jaffer was inconclusive - there was no way to tell whether any part of the foot was or wasn't behind the line. It definitely isn't a black-and-white case like the caught behind.
How is one side completly dominating a contest?
Why don't the people saying "all we really want is a contest" just plain come out and say it: "We want to see Australia lose, badly!".
Are you putting your hand up?You could employ competent umpires to handle the technology.
The whole world knew Symonds was out except Bucknor.We can't ensure anything, the third umpire decision with the stumping proved that. A third umpire gives someone not out and the arguments continue.
Where do I send my resume?Are you putting your hand up?
The umpires are only human. Maybe they're living a less-quality life in terms of hearing and sight but nonetheless, they're only human. Sometimes mistakes like this (as accidental as they may be) may turn a one-sided affair into a contest. I would love to say India would be dominating this match if Symonds wasn't dismissed earlier, but I can't because no-one knows - it's physically possible that someone like Stuart Clark could make 100 not out for example, but hey as I said - no-one knows.So let us find out, by ensuring the correct decisions are made. Isn't that simply logical?
Completely agree. Heaven forbid that Indians and/or Lankans raise anything like a reasonable protest.Thanks for labelling Indians and Lankans as being whingers too.
www.i'mnotblindandicanpressabutton.comWhere do I send my resume?
www.shaadi.comWhere do I send my resume?
I'm Indian by ethnicity, but haven't lived there since I was in primary school.Btw, Evermind, always wondered, what's your background and which team do you support? That's if you don't mind me asking. Not that there should be anything there to mind.
That's where Danish Kaneria got married, no joke seriously. You just reminded me of an interview they had with him on the Cricket Show about 3-4 years ago.
Direct contradiction: http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/cricket/6262651.stmI also like ... the SA teams and dislike most players in the Pakistani team because they're so frequently dishonest and corrupt. I think that ... racism has no place in sport.
Not a big fan of Gibbs, myself.Direct contradiction: http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/cricket/6262651.stm
Girl, I'm a freak you shouldn't say those things. (8)Valvoline. You know what I mean.
There's no real reason to believe wickets are gonna go down either with an attacking field. This pitch is still a batting beauty and while India has bowled fairly well today, they've had no luck. Now these 2 batsmen are set and are looking to pick it up. Might as well start thinking abt containment. Right decision by Kumble to spread the field.Judging by Kumble's field placings, I'd say India are waiting for Australia to declare. They don't believe they can take all of Australia's wickets so are just trying to minimise runs before a possible declaration.