luckyeddie said:Simple - to shut up whiney people
No, he's suggesting that nothing was done to shut whiny people up before.Legglancer said:Are you suggesting that biased Umpiring never existed before ???? I hope not ...
I'm not sure what you mean by that statement....I was an advocate of neutral umpires ever since the hysteria which surrounded David Constant (not because there was anything valid at all in the criticism of David - the 'whiney people' just had it in for him over a couple of decisions, exactly the same as the idiots who had the audacity to cast doubt on David Shepherd's neutrality over a single decision which went against a certain player in the second test) - because he was a personal friend of mine and I thought the accusations were deplorable.Legglancer said:Are you suggesting that biased Umpiring never existed before ???? I hope not ...
Wow, that was witty. Actually I'm a high school student on the prospect of applying to college. I don't feel like boasting, but clearly you don't know Palo Alto.Bapu Rao Swami said:oh please I don't need some grocery store owner or taxi driver working in California to tell me whats silly and whats not :O
cricket.org will do better than us, but India is 329/4 (Sehwag 195, Ganguly and Laxman at the crease)halsey said:I am currently watching The Premiership, so I don't know what is happening at the test. What is happening?