Marsh will get caught at gully again for less than 20....Marsh (y) or (n)?
gut says (n), but he's proven me wrong before.
Agree, hardly water-tight for a openerThat was a terrible shot for someone who's been in. He's had a lot of luck too. I don't think Cowan is a long term solution for the opening position.
The Home of CricketArchivei'll probably die of laughter if he fails so i dunno know
How about Kumar?Should bring on Zaheer for Marsh. Reckon he'd nick off in a matter of minutes.
Terrible post.That was a terrible shot for someone who's been in. He's had a lot of luck too. I don't think Cowan is a long term solution for the opening position.
Watson and Warner for the long term definitely.
Hughes wouldn't be bowled from a nothing ball after he gets in. Just saying.Terrible post.
Was pretty lucky yesterday though to be honest.60-70s seems to be the hoodoo mark for Cowan.
He wouldn't get inHughes wouldn't be bowled from a nothing ball after he gets in. Just saying.
Yeah he'd have been caught behind way earlier.Hughes wouldn't be bowled from a nothing ball after he gets in. Just saying.
You're right, he'd have edged it to slip.Hughes wouldn't be bowled from a nothing ball after he gets in. Just saying.