Haze?I think our best fully fit, available bowler who wasn't selected is Hogan.
I never thought I'd say that. Sad state of affairs.
Granted they have gone for debutants - those guys however were in and around the squad when this panel took over (Warner, Pattinson). So it's not as though they've been all that bold.They have debuted three players in two Tests, tbf.
At least we've picked 13, not 17.Granted they have gone for debutants - those guys however were in and around the squad when this panel took over (Warner, Pattinson). So it's not as though they've been all that bold.
My point is more that it's a weak, conservative panel that retains all three of Hussey, Ponting and Haddin. Those are the decisions that require strength.
I also think Hilfenhaus, averaging an OK 28 this year, hasn't done enough and the selectors have just returned to him because he's played before.
My gut feel is that Hilf will only play if Christian doesn't, that's why they've gone for 13.Is there a need for 13?
Why didn't they just choose between Starc and Hilfy now, as they both can't be in the 11.
Or do they want to see how Hilf bowls in the nets? We know what happened when he was picked on net form last time.
Make a decision FFS.
Didn't get teh feed - at work.Except that Inverarity said that it was a straight race between Marsh and Christian?