mackembhoy
International Regular
They showed that he had something behind the line?What’s your definition of a no ball
So the definition of a no-ball was incorrectly applied by an umpire
They showed that he had something behind the line?What’s your definition of a no ball
Yeah it was. Close, but it was.This is bollocks when that wasn't a no-ball
They showed it again with an enlarged image on Sky coverage. There was something behind the line.Yeah it was. Close, but it was.
You were 100 short.Anyway by no means a terrible score but not a great one either. Distinctly middling like much of Australia's cricket in this series
Certainly left runs out there. 400 was on for them, someone should have tonned up.Anyway by no means a terrible score but not a great one either. Distinctly middling like much of Australia's cricket in this series
Should be fine thenYou were 100 short.