Cabinet96
Hall of Fame Member
They do.Hope Sussex likes his world class form.
They do.Hope Sussex likes his world class form.
Aren't you the same bloke that said this about Philander after one test?Siddle looks unfit and Bird isn't as good as you lot hyped him up to be.
One of the most undeserved in recent times for any bowler.Harris' century up.
Dont say **** like that Invers could be reading.And consequently dropped......
Well, Philander was obviously rubbish because Prior got runs against him. So I don't know what you're talking about.Aren't you the same bloke that said this about Philander after one test?
Look Bird was hyped as being McGrath the 2nd by the crims, bowled slow filth for most of the day today after a pretty ordinary first few days. Hard to be impressed by him after so much hype.Aren't you the same bloke that said this about Philander after one test?
It is annoying but he does supply some insight that's we wouldn't get ie DRS that we wouldn't otherwise get. He's also got a decent cricket brain which is shown up when he's in the box with Botham.Was thinking the same. I guess he's not the type of person to say anything possibly negative on live TV.
He's as boring as ****. I've done morning ablutions with more personality.Was thinking the same. I guess he's not the type of person to say anything possibly negative on live TV.
god this joke has aged brilliantly.i still cant believe they dropped mitch starc for john hastings
Losing teams always chop and change looking for the magic formula. Usually fails and they change it again. It is what poor/average sides do when playing against better opposition and will continue to do for many years to come. England did it throughout the 80's and 90's and it worked so well.Bird is an excellent bowler but I'm inclined to agree that the attack lacks variety.
Why can't they just let some players play a few tests in a row? They let Watson. Why not anyone else?