Who stopped them referring the first one?That’s the second time an obvious decision wasn’t given on field in one session.
This is why we need DRS.
He was out on 30 odd tbf.Hmmm, Australia will probably take this at lunch. England bat deep but this pitch is flat. Reckon Crawley will be disappointed with that shot.
Noene did? Think he's talking about the pope LBW.Who stopped them referring the first one?
I agree.Well that’s our session on that deck and we’ve bowled as badly as we are capable of.
Yeah, you're miles ahead given our four best batsman are either in or to come and we have 120 on the boardWell that’s our session on that deck and we’ve bowled as badly as we are capable of.
They'd be absolutely delighted. 3 down and two (relatively) fresh batsmen? They'd have taken that if it was cloudy and swinging let alone a road.Apart from Hazlewood's bowling, thought Australia were pretty ordinary but I think they won the session with that final wicket.
He’s talking about Pope’s lbw. No one heard the first Crawley edge. You tend not to appeal if there’s no sound or deviation. I know England think they’ve changed the game, but historically those are usually seen as plays and missesWho stopped them referring the first one?