wfdu_ben91
International 12th Man
As long as he gets rid of Kevin Pietersen again.Ah well, all over. 435 is a very decent score on this pitch I reckon. Hopefully Hauritz has confirmed his place for the 2nd Test as well (Y).
As long as he gets rid of Kevin Pietersen again.Ah well, all over. 435 is a very decent score on this pitch I reckon. Hopefully Hauritz has confirmed his place for the 2nd Test as well (Y).
Not even close. Monty's not that bad IMO. Obviously still ****, but not Martin-bad.Monty is laughably poor. Would wonder whether he could rival Chris Martin for lack of batting ability and general unco-ness.
Equal highest wicket taker at a better average than moobs and and hilf...3-95 actually sounds mildly respectable.
Just because he's Nathan Hauritz, every bad ball he bowls should become an excuse to mention how ridiculous he is.3-95 actually sounds mildly respectable.
Should probably try winning matches, rather than relying on Pietersen's brain farts.As long as he gets rid of Kevin Pietersen again.
That's what I'm worried about3-95 actually sounds mildly respectable.
Yeah. I know, I know. But he is comparably unco. He wanders around in a daze like he's mildly ********. Like he went to wander off when Swann was caught off that no-ball. I mean, he's standing next to the guy who just shouted NO BALL.Not even close. Monty's not that bad IMO. Obviously still ****, but not Martin-bad.
Got big turn as well.Yep, showed promise, definitely worth another test or two
Bowled some absolute trash to Steyn over the summer.Well I have a few comments:
1) The only Aussie bowler who seems to remember that the ideal length to tail enders is half way down the pitch is Nathan Hauritz.
2) Apparently to get a player LBW you need to dislodge the bails.
3) I don't think I've seen worse bowling to tail enders by an Australian lineup ever.
Rule is that the front foot can be elevated, doesn't have to be grounded behind the line, but if a line was drawn between the foot and the pitch, it would have to be behind the line. If that makes sense.Oooooo.......... harsh no-ball call there. Don't know the rule exact when the whole foot isn't grounded, any insight?
EDIT: Who cares?
Yeah. I know, I know. But he is comparably unco. He wanders around in a daze like he's mildly ********. Like he went to wander off when Swann was caught off that no-ball. I mean, he's standing next to the guy who just shouted NO BALL.
WAKE UP!
who?Hoping (see praying) for a Prince masterclass.
Ganguly.who?
Yeah, but I actually think when he's playing straight off the seamers he has a pretty tight technique.Yeah. I know, I know. But he is comparably unco. He wanders around in a daze like he's mildly ********. Like he went to wander off when Swann was caught off that no-ball. I mean, he's standing next to the guy who just shouted NO BALL.
WAKE UP!
I said Prince not ****, tbh.Ganguly.