But a piece of the ball is pitched inside the line of the stumps, why should it matter how much of it has to pitch inside when it only takes the slightest fraction of the ball to knock the bails off?Same logic could be used to argue that it doesn't matter if the whole ball pitches outside the line of leg... if it's gonna hit the stumps who cares where pitches... or indeed whether it strikes the batsman in line...
unfortunately what you are proposing is a re-writing of the lbw law which I don't think Doctrove has the authority to do...
It was Anderson, so I don't think there's that much concern. Hauritz's effort in bowling to them was far far worse.Blimey, the Aussies here doing a good impression of whinging poms, TBF.
Good to see
Good point and to answer your question no idea...But a piece of the ball is pitched inside the line of the stumps, why should it matter how much of it has to pitch inside when it only takes the slightest fraction of the ball to knock the bails off?
Goes well with his bowlingThat one was plumb..Panesar's batting hasn't improved
Yep, showed promise, definitely worth another test or two3-95 actually sounds mildly respectable.