andmark
International Captain
Haha, that was almost as good as Sturridge's goal at the weekend. This one is not really the player's fault but still funny:Helmut Winklhofer finally has competition
Haha, that was almost as good as Sturridge's goal at the weekend. This one is not really the player's fault but still funny:Helmut Winklhofer finally has competition
Here it isThat goal Stuttgart conceded from a throw in the other day was pretty lolsy as well. Peter Enkleman-esque.
Did the keeper get a touch as if not I am pretty sure it should not have counted?Here it is
Yeah keeper touched it, or at least the ref deemed that he did. Otherwise yeah, would be a corner instead.Did the keeper get a touch as if not I am pretty sure it should not have counted?
I love how that clip cuts to Klopp, who despite having just seen his team score, appears to be going mad with rage.
That's the funniest thing about it.Did the keeper get a touch as if not I am pretty sure it should not have counted?
Not as good as van der Vaart's assist for the opposition when he was playing for Hamburg.Kramer OG
Why shouldn't it be a goal if the keeper didn't touch it?That's the funniest thing about it.
Had the keeper continued ignoring the ball as it went past him then it wouldn't have been a goal. It's the fact he notices at the last second and gets a faint touch on the ball that makes it a goal.
These things called "the rules". Quite popular in sports. Unless you're from Pakistan.Why shouldn't it be a goal if the keeper didn't touch it?
But why does this rule exist?These things called "the rules". Quite popular in sports. Unless you're from Pakistan.
Haha I was just jesting with you lad.But why does this rule exist?
Ok, I get it now. Any goal can’t be scored from the hand. My bad.
Could have just told me that though.
No worries. Thanks for clearing that up.Haha I was just jesting with you lad.
And it's not just because goals from the hands are not allowed, but because goals from indirect set pieces (such as throw ins) are not permitted.