Which is a darn slight more than looking at the table at the current stage and extrapolating it over 38 gamesHate to smash your dreams kid, but it is. Southampton have performed well and are 3rd in the league. Thats all that really matters at the moment. Sure someone can crunch figures and say 'so and so are performing 2nd or 3rd best' but its kind of irrelevant really, as at best its a educated guess at whats going to come, and can be messed up by countless other things, both within that team and others. All the prizes are awarded for where you finish up in the table, and if you're 3rd after 20% of the season gone, then I'd say you've made a good start and have a fair shout at being up there at the end.
As you brought Arsenal into it, because I know you hate people posting off topic, I probably did call Arsenal for the league last year, I can't remember. However thats not any stats crunching or performance modeling of a serious degree, its one mans opinion, half educated by watching football and having a guess at whats going to happen over the next few games. And it was about as accurate no doubt.
I'm sure Statistical modelling is all well and good, but for me, footballs played on a pitch, not a calculator, and I'll enjoy watching it rather than needlessly fretting over the performance curves and potentials of teams. At the end of the year the league table will tell me the truth of it, whether people think its fair or not doesn't matter as its the table that decides.
Thing is it isn't any different from just hearing where Paul Merson thinks Southampton are going to finish based on what he's seen on Soccer Saturday (which I also enjoy). All predictions are flawed, whether it's some geek with a calculator or some guy at the pub who's had one too many. And in the grand scheme they're pretty much pointless unless you do a lot of betting (the people who make such models do). **** happens, there are things you can't account for, and you get no points for being good alone. But that doesn't mean I don't want to know how people think certain clubs are doing and where they'll finish in the league. I find it fun to speculate and use the opinions/predictions I've seen to be most accurate and logical as the best indicators. With Southampton I've hardly seen them play this season bar on MotD, and don't really know anything about the players they brought in or have promoted after their summer exodus, but some very smart people on my twitter feed told me they were really good then they won a game 8-0, so I thought it worth making the point their perhaps a contender while everyone else's clear flaws get exposed in the mainstream every week.I mean I have no problem with cabinet enjoying that stuff but it's not for me.
I don't remember the point where I said I was doing that. I was looking at the table as the best performance indicator, showing Southampton, like the method Cabinet uses, are the 3rd best team in the league at the moment. Nowhere did I say they are going to finish 3rd. In fact I think I'm pretty clear that I'll let the season play out and judge it based on where teams lie after 38 games. I'm going to bet its not the same as they are now.Which is a darn slight more than looking at the table at the current stage and extrapolating it over 38 games
This might explain the copious amounts I seem to lose on football bets!Thing is it isn't any different from just hearing where Paul Merson thinks Southampton are going to finish based on what he's seen on Soccer Saturday (which I also enjoy). All predictions are flawed, whether it's some geek with a calculator or some guy at the pub who's had one too many. And in the grand scheme they're pretty much pointless unless you do a lot of betting (the people who make such models do). **** happens, there are things you can't account for, and you get no points for being good alone. But that doesn't mean I don't want to know how people think certain clubs are doing and where they'll finish in the league. I find it fun to speculate and use the opinions/predictions I've seen to be most accurate and logical as the best indicators. With Southampton I've hardly seen them play this season bar on MotD, and don't really know anything about the players they brought in or have promoted after their summer exodus, but some very smart people on my twitter feed told me they were really good then they won a game 8-0, so I thought it worth making the point their perhaps a contender while everyone else's clear flaws get exposed in the mainstream every week.
Morecambe doing quite well considering they were tipped for relegation, and they actually are utter turd. If they keep it up my annual trip to the Globe might actually end up with us watching some of the footie.....Anyway, Colchester are doing better than I expected thus far. How's every one else in the lower reaches or nether regions of the league structure going?
I think one of the things people don't realise is how random the results of shots are. If you create two chances and score twice then that's absolutely no indication you'll be able to do it again. If you take 25 and get 15 on target, that's a good indication that you'll probably score two most weeks as shot generation is a much more repeatable measure than shot conversion.One of the best indicators of where a team will end up is the amount/quality of shots they're taking. Right now Southampton aren't fluking it, they are playing like a true top 4 side.
I don't bother with it either, but at the same time there's no point pretending the models aren't more accurate predictors than the league table just because they bore us. CPR's posts earlier were a bit obtuse. Sort of like he was deliberately missing cab's point.I mean I have no problem with cabinet enjoying that stuff but it's not for me.
Not just here but all over the internet. Too much information, everyone being more of an expert(heh) than a supporter. It's why I'm enjoying watching teams that aren't Arsenal, because I can just sit back and not care as much as I do when we play. Hell, I've even watched and enjoyed A-League and ISL games more than any Arsenal game for a long time.I see his point, and his final post on the subject kinda highlights the difference between us, he likes to use these models and gauge predictions/opinions from them. I like to watch games and enjoy the football thats on offer that day, and in the grand scheme of things the league table will tell me who's been the best at the end of the year.I find the overanalysis that goes on with football nowadays terribly boring, perhaps because I care for football for approximately 90 minutes when needed - but for me its entertainment, so i watch it, and have the odd casual conversation when bored (I've been bored approx 10k times over the last decade by the looks of it.)
Alas this thread, IMO, has become less about the enjoyment of the game, and more overanalysis at times. I'd much rather watch video's of City winning the league and seeing grown men cry (thanks Smitteh. ****). I guess given its a forum of cricket fans - a game that does benefit from in depth analysis of form and stats - its inevitable.
Of course I could feel totally different to everyone else....
The ref probably viewed it as an act of kindness, so far out of his depth was Delaney.nyway onto current matters, how the **** can Colin moan about that sending off. He really is a total ****-womble.