chaminda_00
Hall of Fame Member
awtaApplies to Australia vs. any Asian side as well.
also lol at France being better then Argentina on paper. Learn to watch the game Aussie, not the names on their backs.
awtaApplies to Australia vs. any Asian side as well.
All true. But as i said given Argentian central defense is clearly wasn't nothing special since Ayala retired in copa america (come on Heinze in the centre). I would though France's inform strike trio could have scored.But Argentina have the best player in the world plus Agüero and then Tezez on the bench is I better than France's atack , If you then add a superior central midefeald partnership of Gago and Mascherano I can't see why you are so surprised
LOL. never said i did. Just stating valid reasons why i was surprised at the one-sided result.chaminda_00 said:awta
also lol at France being better then Argentina on paper. Learn to watch the game Aussie, not the names on their backs.
Joe Cole and Gerrard are a recipe for a narrow midfield, which just means England have even less time and space to pass it and zero delivery into the box.
I seriously think we could have done better playing our way & not trying to emulate them. But of course that wouldn't have guaranteed victory.
Spain just sat back, looked good and given they kept being presented the ball on a plate didn't really create much. That's pretty much what they've always been like. The main difference is other national sides are piss poor so it makes Spain look better than they are.
England aren't good enough to pass it around for long, they pretty much only looked like a threat when someone like Downing delivered a cross or longer ball (most of the main chances came from him) - otherwise they simply can't string enough passes together to work an opening.
But this is pretty much how it has been for a while. England have to play a simple game to look a threat, the midfield still kills the forward progress by being too close to the defense and love to face towards their own goal, resulting in them pinging the ball back to the player that just passed to them. England are poor technically but they could make things a lot easier for themselves if they had more outlets - hoofing it up to Heskey/Crouch should not be the primary mode of attack.
Well our success last year wasn't built on that old formula of of trying to wipe crosses into the box year was it?
It was EPL style, quick passing & aggressive man to man play.
If the mid-field attack vs Spain last night was:
------------------------------------------------------------------Heskey--------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------Rooney---------------------------------------------------------
Gerrard---------------------------------Lampard---------Carrick/Harg-----------------------------J Cole
Pfft a regulation home three pointer against a team lower in the table then usThis is taking years off my life and I'm only following on Exeweb.
We're not really in much trouble any more. Gaydamak will not be investing any more of his own money, but we don't need to sell more players to survive.Looks like Avram Grant will take over as Portsmouth manager at this stage. Out of interest Barney, I know the club was in some major financial trouble, how much has the sales of Jermain Defoe and Lassana Diarra made to the club's finances?