hahaha....so it would seem....Ph34rkendall said:Everyone is
I was just alluding to your statement that they were getting older. In what world would they walk into the team? Certainly not this one.sledger said:park is totally unproven and will take months to adjust to english football, and correct neither pires or ljungberg are teenagers, but they would both walk into the man utd team.
Many occasions? What are you talking about? They didn't play every game so maybe you're confusing the fringe players.kendall said:You have clearly just got that idea from the F.A cup final on occasions they have lacked finishing but on many occasions they have been completly direft of ideas in midfeald usualy when playing at a low tempo
i see, and i suppose giggs is better than pires ? so who exactly would keep pires out of the side if he joined man utd then ?roseboy64 said:I never said Park was better.
in most games.kendall said:what?? sorry youve lost me.
I am simply saying that last year as a side in many games last year manchester united lacked creativity
and which chances would these have been ? excluding the ones in the FA cup final ?roseboy64 said:If they lacked creativity then why was it that so many chances were created? Certainly the forwards and defnce didn't do it all by themsleves. It was clearly obvious that the problem was finishing not creating opportunities.
Yes Giggs is better. Not by a lot though. He wouldn't walk into the team by any means but he'd still be in with a chance of course. He certainly wouldn't get in ahead of Ronaldo.sledger said:i see, and i suppose giggs is better than pires ? so who exactly would keep pires out of the side if he joined man utd then ?
I do remember a home game against Fulham and some others. I don't remember exactly but I am sure of it.sledger said:and which chances would these have been ? excluding the ones in the FA cup final ?
In the last couple of years pires has been streets ahead of giggsroseboy64 said:Yes Giggs is better. Not by a lot though. He wouldn't walk into the team by any means but he'd still be in with a chance of course. He certainly wouldn't get in ahead of Ronaldo.
the idea that giggs is better than pires is laughable, what do you base that claim on ? as for ronaldo i agree, pires would not oust him, but giggs wouldnt stand in his way.roseboy64 said:Yes Giggs is better. Not by a lot though. He wouldn't walk into the team by any means but he'd still be in with a chance of course. He certainly wouldn't get in ahead of Ronaldo.
and i am sure that you are wrong.roseboy64 said:I do remember a home game against Fulham and some others. I don't remember exactly but I am sure of it.
Arsenal's? Yes, but surprises do happen. Van Persie may just break out this year.kendall said:So the strikeforce isnt good enough? is that what you think?
Well then that remains to be proven and for me too yes I know.sledger said:and i am sure that you are wrong.