• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* English Football Season 2005-06

sledger

Spanish_Vicente
roseboy64 said:
Van der Sar's a more proven goalkeeper than Lehmann and the defence is better. Also, upfront if they're healthy that's a better strikeforce. The midfield's old but they're still good.
how eactly is van der sar more proven ? if you ask me neither are proven to any great extent.
 

sledger

Spanish_Vicente
as would i, although im sure wenger has some plan, i cant see lehmann lasting the entire season in his best form or finishing it at all actually, and i dont fancy almunia in goal, hes pretty rank from what i have seen.
 

kendall

U19 Vice-Captain
what is the latest on baptista or is that move finaly dead? if he was brought in Arsenal would have a very good strikeforce
 

sledger

Spanish_Vicente
still mulling over the offer i think, although he isnt actually a striker, hes more an attacking midfielder, but if arsenal get him then they will have a front line to be wary of ( as if they dont already ) :p
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
For all the discussion of midfields, I'll just ask - which side is currently using Alan Smith in a holding midfield role?
 

aussie

Hall of Fame Member
sledger said:
yeh i agree arsenals midfield is by far superior, how many of giggs, scholes and keane are currently world class, none.
how many are past it and on the decline, all of them.
oh yes even have to agree with this sad fact.....
 

thewizard1o1

International Debutant
sledger said:
how eactly is van der sar more proven ? if you ask me neither are proven to any great extent.
Van Der Sar has done well at every club he has been at, and kept Fulham in a hell of alot of games over the past two seasons, otherwise they would have been a big chance of going down. He also did well when he played in Italy. While he won't be the best keeper in the PL he is streets ahead of Lehmann.
 

aussie

Hall of Fame Member
sledger said:
how eactly is van der sar more proven ? if you ask me neither are proven to any great extent.
well i remember keeping quite well for Fulham in past seasons & internationally for Holland, so i think he's quite proven.Lehmann is the one in my opinion who isn't that proven, i dont even know why the German coach insist on swapping positions with Oliver Khan in the german side.
 

roseboy64

Cricket Web Content Updater
sledger said:
how eactly is van der sar more proven ? if you ask me neither are proven to any great extent.
That's stupid. Van Der Sar's got over 100 caps for his country and he doesn't have to share time with someone like Almunia. You could say that it was Fulham but still that doesn't matter if you look at it logically.
 

roseboy64

Cricket Web Content Updater
marc71178 said:
How will he move without International clearance (that the Brazilian authorities are refusing?)
Well, they will have to. It makes no sense letting him rot on the bench when he could be playing regularly and so improve and so be better for Brazil on the world stage helping them win more trophies.
 

roseboy64

Cricket Web Content Updater
kendall said:
No but it has a lot too do with it on many occasions last year Manchester united has a complete lack of creativity
There was no lack of creativity. It was a lack of finishing.
 

roseboy64

Cricket Web Content Updater
sledger said:
yeh i agree arsenals midfield is by far superior, how many of giggs, scholes and keane are currently world class, none.
how many are past it and on the decline, all of them.
So you're saying Ronaldo and Fletcher are on the decline as well as Park? Pires and Ljungberg aren't exactly teenagers either.
 

sledger

Spanish_Vicente
roseboy64 said:
So you're saying Ronaldo and Fletcher are on the decline as well as Park? Pires and Ljungberg aren't exactly teenagers either.
park is totally unproven and will take months to adjust to english football, and correct neither pires or ljungberg are teenagers, but they would both walk into the man utd team.
 

kendall

U19 Vice-Captain
roseboy64 said:
There was no lack of creativity. It was a lack of finishing.
You have clearly just got that idea from the F.A cup final on occasions they have lacked finishing but on many occasions they have been completly direft of ideas in midfeald usualy when playing at a low tempo
 

Top