Silly reasoning indeed, but the fact that I'd actually back a Hick/Solanki combination to be more effective than the Wright/Cook one we're just about to endure is probably the most worrying thing of all.Did you catch the bit when Nasser Hussain said dead seriously that both Hick and Solanki should open internationally (limited overs cricket) for (paraphrasing) “we would know, what we would get”?
I have no idea but I really hope so. There isn't much else in the way of backup - just a very out-of-form Matt Walker.
In my local newspaper, I read that he scored a fifty for his club this weekend
It's getting tasty down at the Oval. No doubt about it.Well he's not needed with Stevo thankfully retaining his place. He might have a quiet day of it though if Keysey and Denly carry on for much longer
Edit: It always happens doesn't it? Two quick wickets.
82 wanted off 8.3 with two new batsmen in - don't give much for Surrey's chances here.
They play ten games (each team twice) this year, so I don't think you're gone till you've lost four... and even then...
Whooosh
Lets hope we can actually do decent for once though.
It was Ok at times. I thought Kent would pass 200 after the start from their openers and then Kemp was going well: incidentally, one of his 6's was absolutely the biggest hit I have seen at the Oval. Surrey actually pulled them back quite well.
Haha. I quote some catchphrases and get someone diagreeing with me. At least one person knows where it's at.
He needs to last longer than 8 balls though, no matter how good he looks.
