Genuine answer: http://www.cricketweb.net/forum/cri...d-tour-west-indies-2019-a-36.html#post4159344Genuine question. If 90 is the absolute minimum that should be possible in most circumstances then how come no team ever bowls more than that? Almost never happens.
Because there is no incentive to do so unless the bowling side is doing really well/has more than one spinner/is playing under bad lightGenuine question. If 90 is the absolute minimum that should be possible in most circumstances then how come no team ever bowls more than that? Almost never happens.
Think you linked the wrong post. Thai leads me to SCC1's post.
I do. 24 overs were managed before lunch, it was painful. I think I even commented on this thread to the effect.The offence must have occurred in the first innings, I guess. I don't think England's 2nd innings must have taken more than 3.5 hours. I watched the first two sessions of day 1, but I don't remember noticing it being particularly slow or anything.
...Y'all sound like them American baseball fans
Me too! They've announced the squad and it's the same but Keemo Paul in for Holder. Sensible selection again, I just don't know how to feel, this is unheard of!Really want to see Oshane Thomas let it fly. This will go down as one of the "thiccest" fast bowling attacks of all time. A real wall of muscle.
Can't wait for him to get belted.Looks like Wood will replace Curran in the next Test.