SillyCowCorner1
Moooo
Chucking: >15 degrees
Over rate: 15overs/hour
Closest bat average to 15.00: 14.65-H.M.R.K.B Herath
A trend
Over rate: 15overs/hour
Closest bat average to 15.00: 14.65-H.M.R.K.B Herath
A trend
This. Give the umpires something to do.I used to think over rates were an issue but it is really all about whether the cricket is entertaining. Really, it shouldn't be about reaching a certain rare but whether the bowling side is tactically slowing the rates down and the umps clamping down on unnecessary delays.
This is actually not a bad idea. Bad overrate? You can go without lunch. Only problem is it also penalizes the batting side.Just bowl your mandated overs ffs. Slow over rates are a cynical tactic where the bowling team can pace the tempo of the day to suit themselves. I'd have em bowl 30 a session and they stay out there until they do. No tucker for you.
***** thinks they already have too much on their plate for them to be judged on their decision-making..This. Give the umpires something to do.
Hi fishyguy,so whos gonna replace holder probably an allrounder maybe keemo paul. Is Oshane Thomas in the squad think i saw him at the match on day 3
Well yeh, obviously. But of a leading comment though.No one, and I mean no one, buys a ticket to a day's play and says "Gotta get my 90 overs in or there's no value." FMD when they used to bowl 100 overs in a day sides would be 3/190 or 200 at stumps. Do you reckon that's more entertaining than 300 getting scored in a day off 85 overs, or a side getting rolled in a day comprising 82 overs? Of course it isn't.
I think if batsmen are on top they’d prefer to stay out there rather than start again. I’d also allow them refreshments every other over while the bowling side can look on enviously.This is actually not a bad idea. Bad overrate? You can go without lunch. Only problem is it also penalizes the batting side.
I do. 90 is the min that needs to bowled, there is actually scope for getting more....The fact that some sides don't even reach the min is a blight on the game.No one, and I mean no one, buys a ticket to a day's play and says "Gotta get my 90 overs in or there's no value." FMD when they used to bowl 100 overs in a day sides would be 3/190 or 200 at stumps. Do you reckon that's more entertaining than 300 getting scored in a day off 85 overs, or a side getting rolled in a day comprising 82 overs? Of course it isn't.
Same as Faf if they stick to the rules they wouldn't be in trouble. Again 90 is the min that needs to be bowled.The logic is fine but has any spectator or fan really given a crap if they only saw 87 overs in a day or whatever it was? From my perspective, it's an issue only administrators and TV types care about.
I get he was probably warned and we don't want to return to the days when the WI quicks snapped their way through 70 overs a day in the 80s. But now the 3rd Test will be without the world's most in-form all-rounder. Want a way to ensure there will be fewer paying customers at the ground and viewers on the TV...
Umpires and TV crews will complain about missing their lunch...I think if batsmen are on top they’d prefer to stay out there rather than start again. I’d also allow them refreshments every other over while the bowling side can look on enviously.
I'd love Rakheem to play but they're just not going to do it. So the common sense selection is to bring in Keemo Paul for Holder and allow Alzarri Joseph some time off. As St Lucia is by a distance the quickest pitch in the Caribbean nwoadays, I very much doubt Warrican will play. So the team will almost certainly be:Hi fishyguy,
From the looks of things, there will be two changes: Holder and Alzarri out.
Who's gonna replace them?
Keemo Paul is in the mold of a bowling allrounder, so he might replace Holder.
While either Oshane (he's in the squad) or Jomel Warrican gets a go at Alzarri's spot.
OR a left field inclusion of a certain Rahkeem Cornwall; )
I agree with all this. I still think it's not rocket science to get 90 overs in or close to 90 overs in a day though. In the last test West Indies were waaay behind basically because Shannon Gabriel takes 6 minutes to complete an over at best. If he just hurried up even a little bit, it would make a big difference and Jason wouldn't get banned.I do agree with comments regarding the role of the umpires. They should be in charge of hurrying things along when it's obvious certain time delaying tactics are in play or if the players genuinely don't realise how long they're taking then the umpires should be there to inform them to hurry up and cut out all the unnecessary stuff. This could be information fed to them by the third umpire as I'm sure they have enough to concentrate on the pitch, but it is easy to tell when a side are labouring through their overs without good reason.
No one expects quick bowlers to bowl 20-22 overs an hour, like when two spinners are operating in tandem. The indication from recent games is that captains don't get penalised if, on an average, 14 overs are bowled in an hour. That is ridiculously easy to achieve even if quick bowlers are bowling all the time.I agree with all this. I still think it's not rocket science to get 90 overs in or close to 90 overs in a day though. In the last test West Indies were waaay behind basically because Shannon Gabriel takes 6 minutes to complete an over at best. If he just hurried up even a little bit, it would make a big difference and Jason wouldn't get banned.
Yep totally. There's no problem with Alzarri, Kemar or Jason himself. It's literally Shannon Gabriel taking ages to complete overs, especially when he was sore on Day 1. He needs to up it and we'll be fine.No one expects quick bowlers to bowl 20-22 overs an hour, like when two spinners are operating in tandem. The indication from recent games is that captains don't get penalised if, on an average, 14 overs are bowled in an hour. That is ridiculously easy to achieve even if quick bowlers are bowling all the time.