• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* England in West Indies

Woodster

International Captain
Big Bell fan here also. Started exceptionally well, but we have to become used to that, befoer he inexplicably gets himself out. Am hopeful today is so different.
 

four_or_six

Cricketer Of The Year
So you reckon Hauritz is better than Panesar?

I'm not a huge Panesar fan but he'd walk into the Australian team at the moment.
He'd be the worst Australian fielder since um... I don't know. I don't remember any Australian fielders quite like Panesar.
 

Mr Mxyzptlk

Request Your Custom Title Now!
I understand the team was picked prior to his mammoth innings, but even before that knock he had done enough to be in serious consideration for the side.
Not really. In the cricket he had played before the squad, he hadn't done anything of note really. And that was his first first-class cricket for a year. It was perfectly fair to see him in form before picking him. Especially given his discipline problems.
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
He'd be the worst Australian fielder since um... I don't know. I don't remember any Australian fielders quite like Panesar.
Shaun Tait's pretty damn terrible. Not quite as bad as Panesar, but there aren't many who are.

If he had a terrible attitude to his fielding and refused to work on it, I could see him getting left out of the Australian team for that.. but he seems to just be bad. He'd get picked.
 

Scaly piscine

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
That's not really saying much though is it. Not saying he shouldn't be in the side but outside a couple of great innings he is been really quite poor for the last year. In my opinion there is very little difference in terms of overall performance between Bell at 5 and Collingwod at 5. In fact in theory I would rather have Bell.
There's a huge difference if you're playing any remotely decent side on anything but a road.

Not only will Colly get you important runs and more of them in the first place, he'll hang around longer. He's also contributes more when you look outside the batting.
 

Scaly piscine

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
So you reckon Hauritz is better than Panesar?

I'm not a huge Panesar fan but he'd walk into the Australian team at the moment.
Doubt it because he'd be expected to pose a threat against good sides - which he simply doesn't beyond the occasional bunsen.
 

Mr Mxyzptlk

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Doubt it because he'd be expected to pose a threat against good sides - which he simply doesn't beyond the occasional bunsen.
Australia are extremely keen on playing a spinner though. And Panesar is more likely to do well than any of Hauritz, Casson, White, Krezja, surely. Or at least not to be dominated as brutally.
 

Goughy

Hall of Fame Member
Well I never. Everything Ive ever written about the head position of Panesar. Well this is the first time Ive seen Benn and he makes Panesar look technicaly perfect.

Cant see how he can land 3 balls in a row on the same length
 

Top