Yeah, I'm watching it because it's cricket, but in truth I'd rather do something else. I'm watching it out of habit more than anything else.Haha, this thread is almost as dead as the pitch
I'm not really enjoying it at all, but I'd feel all dirty if I changed the channel.Bahahaha. Even I'm not watching this one.
I actually went to a lecture I normally skip earlier in order to avoid it.I'm not really enjoying it at all, but I'd feel all dirty if I changed the channel.
Out of interest, did you google 'Jekyll' to check the spelling before typing it? I would have, just wandered how many others doWe've seen a wonderful day five followed by an awful day five, and of course England hideously refused to reach day five in the first test. A Jekyll & Hyde series
The difference is, in England, theres usually something in even the flattest of pitches, especially with the different type of balls used. Its already been said that both teams have fairly toothless attacks, but TBH, the only type of bowler who would be able to get something out of it is a genuine quick. That said, even Fidel Edwards who has bowled 90mph+ hasn't had huge success.It's really pissing me off how much they're bemoaning the pitch, particularly the England players. Fair enough this is a good batting pitch but it's a million miles from Multan or Karachi. England are a team to talk too, according to Cricinfo Lords, The Oval and Headingely have been among the ten flattest pitches in the world over the last 5 years or so. This test has highlighted the mediocrity of both attacks more than anything else, some batsmen are often labelled flat track bullies, England's bowlers are the equivalent, they only perform in helpful condtions. The best attacks in the world (India and SA) are to an extent able to take the pitch out of the equation, a skill that's becoming increasingly important given the proliferation of good batting surfaces. I wish the players would just cut the bull****, admit their shortcomings and tell the public where they need to improve.
Me neither. I've given up on this and the SL-Pak tests.Bahahaha. Even I'm not watching this one.
Nah, Malcolm would find a way, pace, cutters, reverse swing, he had it all.Even Malcolm Marshall would've ended up with > 35 average if he had to play on pitches like these all his life.
Tbf to Edwards, had his fielders been any good in the first dig he'd have returned great figures.The difference is, in England, theres usually something in even the flattest of pitches, especially with the different type of balls used. Its already been said that both teams have fairly toothless attacks, but TBH, the only type of bowler who would be able to get something out of it is a genuine quick. That said, even Fidel Edwards who has bowled 90mph+ hasn't had huge success.
Anyway, well batted Alistair Cook, despite the state of the pitch, it took some steel to get there in the end.
Out of interest, did you google 'Jekyll' to check the spelling before typing it? I would have, just wandered how many others do
I just went with it in all honesty - I use Explorer btwFirefox - built in spell checker .
If the Windies could catch they would've got England all out for around 400-450 and made a proper game of it. Shame really.Tbf to Edwards, had his fielders been any good in the first dig he'd have returned great figures.
The players having to out and field for an hour rather than relaxing in the evening sun wouldn't find it very funny.I reckon we should declare for a laugh