No, that's arse-about-face. If there's no clear evidence it surely makes more sense to stay with the original shout? "I can't tell either way so you must be wrong, Rodney."
Two slightly different points I think. I was talking about the concept of the benefit of the doubt, rather than whether it's the right standard to apply.
Not rolling over and letting them tickle his tummy I think. That and not openin last night.
Imagine Broad as he's commonly stereotyped.
IndeedIn the last match he and a few other players were walking on the pitch a bit too much. After the appeal for Cook in the 4th innings at Galle all the players went and stood in the danger area of e pitch, and when Dilshan had a possible caught and bowled he ran down the middle of the pitch in his follow through which wasn't necessary. There was also thaqt incident with Pietersen when he practically refused to bowl, whenever Pietersen was about to play a swith hit, resulting in Pietersen being warned for time wasting when in actual fact it was Dilshan who was wasting time.
I don't blame him for not bowling when a bloke decides to essentially go from being left handed to right handed as you're in your run up.Sky showed a possible red mark on the ba after the ball passed. High possibility that it was a little feather.
In the last match he and a few other players were walking on the pitch a bit too much. After the appeal for Cook in the 4th innings at Galle all the players went and stood in the danger area of e pitch, and when Dilshan had a possible caught and bowled he ran down the middle of the pitch in his follow through which wasn't necessary. There was also thaqt incident with Pietersen when he practically refused to bowl, whenever Pietersen was about to play a swith hit, resulting in Pietersen being warned for time wasting when in actual fact it was Dilshan who was wasting time.
Neither do I. I mean if someone tried that it'd be so obvious and the chances that it'd deliver anything other than a Harmy or a rank long-hop are so small that, well...
