Hard to argue.You have been dire in match threads of late Campsy.
Indeed. Scaly to confirm.We cannot lose this series. CAN YOU HEAR ME PEOPLE. WE CANNOT LOSE IT.
BECAUSE WE PICKED IAN BELL
Be Quiet, nothing wrong with it at all.delayed declaration by smith ???
Nah, I think it was the right call. England only needed 3.3rpo or something to win when he declared, so he couldn't have really declared much earlier. I actually thought an England win was more likely than a draw but I forgot to take Paul Collingwood into consideration.delayed declaration by smith ???
In fact it should be the Saffas that are celebrating the draw, they got off lightlyBe Quiet, nothing wrong with it at all.
Swann and Onions would have batted for hours anyway.
Well yes. I'm sure they do try not to lose on purpose...I swear england do this **** on purpose.
The only (i mean ONLY!) time I have ever bet on darts was a bet on Phil Taylor and he lost.Blimey.
I don't know why I put myself through this.
I may instead follow darts, support Phil "the Power" Taylor, and relax safely in the knowledge of a win.
You have been dire in match threads of late Campsy.Well yes. I'm sure they do try not to lose on purpose...
Sorry butThe only (i mean ONLY!) time I have ever bet on darts was a bet on Phil Taylor and he lost.
Was ****ing cut.
Droll.Well yes. I'm sure they do try not to lose on purpose...
Harder to argue.You have been dire in match threads of late Campsy.
Nice to see I made your sig, ****Batting 141+ overs in the 4th innings in the past 30 years and not losing
England 351/5 (165.0 ov) draw v South Africa Johannesburg 30 Nov 1995
England 307/6 (146.4 ov) won v New Zealand Christchurch 14 Feb 1997
Bangladesh 285/5 (142.0 ov) draw v Zimbabwe Dhaka 14 Jan 2005
England 296/9 (141.0 ov) draw v South Africa Cape Town 3 Jan 2010
(Australia used to be the experts but haven't done it since 1971...possibly because they don't nee 141 overs to win )