• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* England in South Africa Thread

SpaceMonkey

International Debutant
jot1 said:
Seems Pieterson's put in the fastest 100 ever in an ODI
Fastest by an Englishmen* but only the 9th fastest of all time (level with Sehwags fastest ever).



[SIZE=-2]*oooooo i can see the smoke coming from Langeveldt keys already[/SIZE]
 

Blaze

Banned
Swervy said:
the fact that England are now ranked 7th just goes to show how closely bunched that middle pack are...each one of those teams could easily be ranked 3rd soon enough
NZ and Sri Lanka are clearly the two best ODI sides after AUS IMO.

4-8 are all closely bunched though..
 

tooextracool

International Coach
Blaze said:
NZ and Sri Lanka are clearly the two best ODI sides after AUS IMO.

4-8 are all closely bunched though..
how the hell is SL clearly better than everyone else?
as far as i remember they are still rubbish away from home in ODIs.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
marc71178 said:
Under the 4.5 limit.
The limit of what can possibly ever be anything vaguely resembling good.
4.41-an-over, while less than 4.5-an-over, is still very poor.
 

tooextracool

International Coach
so why is that even the limit then if anything less than that is still poor? basically it all comes down to whether or not you like the player and if he has a successful domestic record.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
Barney Rubble said:
Strauss doesn't like no4
Don't disagree with the rest of the post but must take issue with this: Strauss has batted at four in 22 out of his 27 ODIs - including the part when he was most successful. Until this tour everyone was saying he should bat four because he batted well with Flintoff a couple of times.
 
Richard you're about as close to a "Cricketing God" as Verne Troyer is of being brought off the Bench for the Chicago Bulls' next NBL game. For your information Richard, Strauss was a music composer not a cricketer you dill. Now please specify, do you wish to discuss Richard or Johann?
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
Pinkline Jones said:
Richard you're about as close to a "Cricketing God" as ... BLAH BLAH BLAH
And of course I put that slogan under my name, didn't I? 8-)
Take it out with James if you really want to.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
marc71178 said:
No, it is not - because the game doesn't potter along at 4-4.2 an over any more.
Because the bowlers aren't good enough at present to keep it down to that.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
tooextracool said:
so why is that even the limit then if anything less than that is still poor? basically it all comes down to whether or not you like the player and if he has a successful domestic record.
Nope, not at all.
Anything under 4.2-an-over is very good - anything over 4.5 can never, ever be good regardless of anything. If you're going at 4.45, for instance, while bowling at the death regularly it's still just about acceptible.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
SpaceMonkey said:
Seems weird having so long with no English cricket now considering how jam packed the calendar normally is :(
It does - it's one of these things like Global warming - when you think about it it's great that we've got such a long break - but it gets boring when you're just contemplating it casually.
 

Top