superkingdave
Hall of Fame Member
Vaughan might agree, Harmo back..
Wicket 34 for the year.superkingdave said:yes! Flintoff strikes
yes!marc71178 said:Sorry, are you calling Tim Henman a loser?
2 big guns both get ducks - nice.superkingdave said:Harmison WOW, Kallis goes for 0, go Harmi!
Then you can only be described as a grade A fool.steds said:yes!
marc71178 said:Then you can only be described as a Grade A fool
maybe they were gobsmackedScaly piscine said:cricinfo being a bit of a shambles, they don't seem to know whether it's Flintoff or Hoggard bowling and how's this for a brilliant description of the Kallis dismissal:
19.4 Harmison to Kallis, OUT:
South Africa 66/3, Partnership of 3
JH Kallis b Harmison 0 (7b 0x4 0x6)
JA Rudolph 32* (63b 6x4) SJ Harmison 6.4-1-31-1 (3w)
Erm, BBC havent got the radio rights??? Who have??Scaly piscine said:btw did the BBC not get the radio rights to this series?
Erm, how does he get to being one of the all round top players in the world by being a loser?steds said:why?
The fella hasn't won anything of importance and still every Wimbledon time, "it's Tims year"...and everyone sits, expecting him to do great things and what happens?
TalksportLangeveldt said:Erm, BBC havent got the radio rights??? Who have??
Well there's naff all on the BBC website so far, but cricinfo was apologising for not having audio so maybe there's some technical ****up/legal rangling at SA's end... or notLangeveldt said:Erm, BBC havent got the radio rights??? Who have??