Malik cought the ball but it touched the grass whilst in his hands and his body language showed that. Good to see an honest player. The only one fooled was Tony Greig who embarassed himself by calling it a mistake by the umpire to cover his poor commentary.Mr Casson said:When Clarke was on 85 the other day, Shoaib Malik took what appeared to be a straightforward catch, but then told the umpires he wasn't sure. Obviously unaware that the umpires can not refer a catch to the third umpire unless his vision is obscured, he had given them just enough doubt to have to rule not out.
Different rules for tests and ODIs? Or did Bucknor stuff up again?
You didn't see them discussing it on TV for a couple of minutes? You are watching this on Foxtel, yes?Mr Casson said:I didn't see that, and quite frankly I don't believe you.
No change there then!! Poor old tony...Scallywag said:. The only one fooled was Tony Greig who embarassed himself by calling it a mistake by the umpire to cover his poor commentary.
Playing the new ball on its merits, I would think. If anything loose is offered, they'll take it, but if not then they should be concentrating on keeping it out.twctopcat said:Have england shut up shop already?
Fat Bob, as nice a bloke as he is, is certainly under threat. I want Bell in ASAP - not for any real rational reason other than it's one of our options and I've always been a fan of his.BoyBrumby said:Fat Bob certainly never quite convinces, does he? Plumb as you like playing across the line.
Hopefully Bell will put his hand up in the ODIs & get a go against Bangladesh.
Otherwise it'll be back to Butch, I suspect...
Sounds right. The higher up for Vaughan the better.Scaly piscine said:I'd like to see England have Tresco, Strauss and Vaughan as the top 3, I think they'd be fairly solid then Bell at 4. Always feel like when England lose their first wicket it's gonna be followed by another one shortly after with Butcher or Key there.