Summed it up perfectly.Link said:Tres - he never really looks like he has 'gotten in'
And when has Harmison ever been successful against a quality team or on a good batting track?badgerhair said:I think there were a few people saying that about Harmison during the last Eng-SA series.
England v NZ were all pretty good tracks and how many times has he played 'quality teams'? (probably defined as teams he hasn't done well against by zebra)a massive zebra said:And when has Harmison ever been successful against a quality team or on a good batting track?
So the 7th best team in the world are quality are they? Even their established players like Fleming, Astle and McMillan only average in the 30s. He has played and failed against all the best teams - Australia (9 wickets @ 50.55), India (5 wickets @ 44.00) and South Africa (16 wickets @ 52.81). Against the three weakest teams, however, he has really cashed in - West Indies (40 wickets @ 21.10), Zimbabwe (9 wickets@ 16.44) and Bangladesh (9 wickets @ 8.77). All the evidence points to him being a bad track bully and a minnow basher.Scaly piscine said:England v NZ were all pretty good tracks and how many times has he played 'quality teams'? (probably defined as teams he hasn't done well against by zebra)
I bet it rains all day and it's blue sky tomorrow...
a massive zebra said:And when has Harmison ever been successful against a quality team or on a good batting track?
SA at the oval.a massive zebra said:And when has Harmison ever been successful against a quality team?
lords vs NZ, trent bridge vs NZ, oval vs WI.a massive zebra said:or on a good batting track?
err richardson was averaging 47 at the time, oram averages 43, fleming averages 39.33, and really has been averaging 70 and 46 in the last 2 years.a massive zebra said:So the 7th best team in the world are quality are they? Even their established players like Fleming, Astle and McMillan only average in the 30s..
yes well done in including all his figures when he was truly rubbish.a massive zebra said:He has played and failed against all the best teams - Australia (9 wickets @ 50.55), India (5 wickets @ 44.00)..
really i was expecting some fool to have a go at him after what hes done this series.Scaly piscine said:I also suggest you wait to see what he does in the rest of this series. Since most of those bad stats you quote were from his early Test match career (I'm sure most people can remember what he was like then) only an idiot would try to make a point out of them...
Harmison's batting is so under-rated. I'm not going to jump on a bandwagon and call him an all-rounder, but he's a hell of a number 11, a clean hitter and an exciting player to watch!!Mister Wright said:Harmison on fire! This is exciting stuff.