• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** England in Pakistan

greg

International Debutant
steds said:
Someone with a chance of an international future, rather then some 36 year old
Who then?

We want to win the series, he's there as direct cover for Giles, and to provide an option should we want a spinner turning the ball into the right handers. Loudon is there for the future.
 
Last edited:

Pothas

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
greg said:
Actually I think that there is another factor in the debate which is that he doesn't bat in the right way. England don't just want a keeper who can bat but one who can counter attack, score quick runs when having to bat with the tail, turn a game in 40 mins etc.

).
But why do they need this? It is simply an atempt to create an English Gilchrist. With pieterson and Flintoff at 5 and 6 they really dont need a counter attacking keeper
 

Barney Rubble

International Coach
Pothas said:
But why do they need this? It is simply an atempt to create an English Gilchrist. With pieterson and Flintoff at 5 and 6 they really dont need a counter attacking keeper
We don't need one, but you could also say Australia never really needed Gilchrist - but having him there is one of the factors that has made them the best team in the world for the last decade.
 

aussie

Hall of Fame Member
it strange but if you look at it i agree with Udal & Loundon's selection in the test squad to be honest, but since Gough said he's unavailable i'm a bit perplexed by Plunkett's selection isn't their anyone else better in the county circuit maynnnnnn?
 

Barney Rubble

International Coach
SpaceMonkey said:
Its shocking how we just cant produce good spinners...its not like we havent in the past. Just the last 10 years or so its being a joke.
A lot of it might be in the pitches - I can honestly say, having played around 100 cricket matches in my short life, that I have never played on a bunsen. I netted on a hard, bouncy wicket once, and I (along with most of my team-mates) would have been out cheaply about three times in the length of time it took us to adjust - the wickets at junior level in this country just don't spin or bounce, so it takes something really exceptional to make it as a spinner. Likewise, many young batsmen have technical flaws against spin that it takes years to eradicate.

I know a young leggie who has impressed the Sussex coaches and almost received a call-up for their youth squad - but who, at the age of 18, has only ever taken two five-fors. Likewise another spinner I know, a left-armer in the same situation. On the verge of a county call-up, but the coach tells him he needs to start getting bigger hauls - how can he when he bowls on greentops week in, week out?
 

twctopcat

International Regular
Prior is a counterattacking batsmen if he wants to be. Can play as defensive as needs be. In the games i've seen this year he has scored quickly with orthodox shots and kept well to the likes of mushy. I know a lot of people like Read but Prior is 23 (i think) and has a lot more potential in every department.
 

Scaly piscine

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
aussie said:
it strange but if you look at it i agree with Udal & Loundon's selection in the test squad to be honest, but since Gough said he's unavailable i'm a bit perplexed by Plunkett's selection isn't their anyone else better in the county circuit maynnnnnn?
Plunkett have been picked mainly for the future with an eye on the World Cup in 2007, he'd fit the bowler who bats a bit position if all goes well. It'd be good to see 3 Durham players in the ODI side also.
 

Neil Pickup

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Scaly piscine said:
Plunkett have been picked mainly for the future with an eye on the World Cup in 2007, he'd fit the bowler who bats a bit position if all goes well. It'd be good to see 3 Durham players in the ODI side also.
I think it also may be selection as a reward for sconing your mate Richard nine years ago.
 

Neil Pickup

Request Your Custom Title Now!
steds said:
Someone with a chance of an international future, rather then some 36 year old
Any names? There just isn't anyone. There isn't even anyone else worthy of an academy call - Batty and Dalrymple are in as all-rounders.
 

Barney Rubble

International Coach
Neil Pickup said:
I think it also may be selection as a reward for sconing your mate Richard nine years ago.
Richard got sconed by an 11-year-old? Pardon me for saying so, but :laugh: - even I never managed that!
 

Neil Pickup

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Barney Rubble said:
Richard got sconed by an 11-year-old? Pardon me for saying so, but :laugh: - even I never managed that!
Richard said:
A broken nose can't heal in 2 and a half weeks. Believe me, I got one from a direct cricket-ball (no helmet), albeit at at least 10 mph slower than Drakes. From a guy called Liam Plunkett, who is now on the Durham staff, when he was 12.
See here.
 

Barney Rubble

International Coach
Neil Pickup said:
At least 10mph slower than Drakes? :blink:

I'm assuming he meant Vasbert Drakes, who bowls at around 80-82mph IIRC. That means Liam Plunkett could bowl at 70mph when he was 12 - that can't be right. Richard's got something seriously wrong there.

With your experience as a coach, Neil, how fast do you think the fastest 12-year-olds bowl? I'm interested to know, as it's about the speed my off-breaks travel at. :)
 

Neil Pickup

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Well, if you'd been following Scoreboard Confessional as closely as you ought to have been you wouldn't need to ask...

The fastest 12-year-old at the East Devon Colts trials is capable of high 50s and has probably broken 60 when he has got it right (which isn't as often as I'd like, it's too short too often at present, but we're getting there). I can still stand up to that pace, but it requires plenty concentration on my part.

I know that there are 14-year-olds capable of 77mph in the district (who have been selected for the West of England U15s next season). I wouldn't count out Plunkett of being able to bowl high 60s at the age of 12, even if that's the top speed I can manage at present...
 

Pothas

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Barney Rubble said:
We don't need one, but you could also say Australia never really needed Gilchrist - but having him there is one of the factors that has made them the best team in the world for the last decade.
But Prior isnt Gilchrist is he?
 

Top