superkingdave
Hall of Fame Member
finished, goodbye Zimbabwe. IIRC they are flying out ASAP.
Bell with a ODI bowling average of 3 for now
Bell with a ODI bowling average of 3 for now
Funny coincidence, you keep going on about this "worse than the rest" rubbish.marc71178 said:In the context of the innings they were poor.
Without the last 2 overs they were very very poor.
Yet again he's performed worse than the rest of the attack, yet you continue to say he's been acceptable.
And he's a player you like, funny coincidence there.
His first List-A Limited-Overs over, and no it would NOT have been funny if he'd got a wicket, thank God he didn't.Barney Rubble said:That was a bit of a joke - even Strauss bowled an over. Is it just me or does he NEVER bowl? Would have been dead funny if he'd got the last wicket.
Totally inexplicable that he didn't play until now.Nnanden said:forgot to mention...
im a big fan of rainsford, very glad to see he bowled so well. a bright light for zimbabwe
Not a moment too soon.superkingdave said:finished, goodbye Zimbabwe. IIRC they are flying out ASAP.
Bell with a ODI bowling average of 3 for now
It's only Zimbabwe.steds said:Vaughan scored 90??!?!?!?! In an ODI?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?
Chigumbura got smashed even further than Nkala.Prince EWS said:Ahh.. Nkala bowling now.... and getting tonked again...
Why is he even in the squad? What about Mahwire? (dont laugh, hes been in awesome form in the Logan Cup and their OD comp).
I've seen Panyangara and Chigumbura once, which is quite enough!Langeveldt said:I don't understand how you guys can be so certain about these Zimbos having never actually seen them play.. I don't think the logan cup, or a handful of ODI's tell you very much..
Maybe that's because he keeps on being the worst of the bunch?Richard said:Funny coincidence, you keep going on about this "worse than the rest" rubbish.
Why would it not have been funny?Richard said:His first List-A Limited-Overs over, and no it would NOT have been funny if he'd got a wicket, thank God he didn't.
I guessed something must have changed.Prince EWS said:Has anyone noticed the bowling of Matsikenyeri lately? Its improving leaps and bounds! He completely changed his action (as in, scrapped the old one completely!) not five months ago.
Yes, but if Strauss bowls in a ODI again I'll eat my computer.marc71178 said:Why would it not have been funny?
In a way it (along with Collingwood's bizarre figures) would've summed up the whole series.
Yes, yet again he came on was played around comfortably, didn't threaten, the batsmen survived and then pummelled the bowling because they had wickets left in the death overs.Richard said:Of course, none of them are a patch on good old Prosper - again.
How is it enough?Richard said:I've seen Panyangara and Chigumbura once, which is quite enough!
Hands note to mr VaughanRichard said:Yes, but if Strauss bowls in a ODI again I'll eat my computer.
He does not deserve an ODI average of 3.
You really don't understand much about the one-day game, do you?marc71178 said:Yes, yet again he came on was played around comfortably, didn't threaten, the batsmen survived and then pummelled the bowling because they had wickets left in the death overs.
What a great player he is (!)
It, along with looking at the outcomes of other games, tells you enough, believe me.marc71178 said:How is it enough?
1 viewing of a player tells us next to nothing about them.
And maybe - just maybe - it doesn't matter as long as he's still doing acceptibly.marc71178 said:Maybe that's because he keeps on being the worst of the bunch?