Haha yeah sehwag would bat at a strike rate of 90 and he'd then go out and every other batsman would struggle. Wag he was.This is the kind of pitch we used to regularly put out during the 2010 side's rise to No. 1. A bit boring unless you have Sehwag in your side.
This series had made me long for the SA series last year. Like they've gone too far in the other way after the criticism for the turners they put up.This is the kind of pitch we used to regularly put out during the 2010 side's rise to No. 1. A bit boring unless you have Sehwag in your side.
Nah. I love the four/five test series. It is the ultimate brand of cricket. That Pakistan series in the summer for instance was superb and should have had a fifth test. Often with the three tests, I end up wanting more.No team should be playing more than 3 tests against India in India. Problem is no matter how weak Australia and England are in these conditions, the test series between the big 3 will always be 4/5 tests due to the money. I'm actually looking forward to that lone Bangladesh v India test than this one-sided test series. Apart from the Ashes, no other test series should consist of more than 3 tests. Even a 1 match test series is a good idea.
Only these last two have been proper roads tbf, the first three were all just good planning on the part of India.This series had made me long for the SA series last year. Like they've gone too far in the other way after the criticism for the turners they put up.
Also makes it easier to troll India about being roads again
Mumbai certainly wasn't a road. 1st and 5th were probably the old Indian type flat wicket. 2,3 and 4 offered some different things for bowlers iirc.Only these last two have been proper roads tbf, the first three were all just good planning on the part of India.
spoiler alertIndia to get about 700 on this deck and England to collapse
such as?Mumbai certainly wasn't a road. 1st and 5th were probably the old Indian type flat wicket. 2,3 and 4 offered some different things for bowlers iirc.