Richard
Cricket Web Staff Member
The best I can do is Hussain's diary about a year ago "return to Hotel. Gilo and Vaughanie now inseperable".marc71178 said:I assume you have a lot of facts to back this up?
Whether this proves much I don't know, but I don't think it's had any influence on selection - the reason I think Giles got, and IMO deserved, his selection is because, before The First Test this series, out of 8 Tests played on the subcontinent he'd done well in 5 of them.
How many fingerspinners playing anywhere but the subcontinent or West Indies do?Like it or not, he is our number one spinner, and a handy number 8 to boot.
OK, he may not turn it a mile, but how many people brought up in England do?
None. It's simply not possible to spin the ball enough with your fingers to achieve significant (ie that will threaten a decent batsman) turn on a pitch typical to England, New Zealand, South Africa, Zimbabwe or Australia.
If you want to take wickets in conditions typical to these countries against competant batting when bowling slow you've got to spin it with your wrists - full-stop. Warne, Mushtaq and Murali do - and they've achieved success. How many fingerspinners have achieved success in a Test-series in England recently? Daniel Vettori's about the only one. And he's somehow a special case. The only fingerspinner I'd have in his country's Test XI on any pitch. Though England's batting wasn't exactly something to write home about that series.