Again that is all nonsense. The World Cup is still 3 years after this and who knows whether those 3 will even be in the team then. The pitches would have changed, Australian bowlers would be different.Are you blokes taking the piss?
India have come out and said they're rotating Gambhir, Sachin and Sehwag because they've all played plenty of cricket in Australia, and they want to make sure that Raina, Sharma and Kohli play enough cricket in Australia since the next World Cup is going to be here.
First you need to get to the Final though. A couple of losses and boom that goes out of the Window.Do you really think Sachin needs more practice here?
And obviously they won't rotate in the final for Christ's sake. Strawman rubbish.
Out now. The big worry is that LBW problem, this time luckily it was going over the stumps.For someone who is supposedly back in form, Ponting has looked rather **** so far this series.
Wade has always played as a floater. His recent success has been opening however.I'm still not following here, I thought Wade was an opener? Why exactly did they get Ponting to open?
The Australian cricket team is like college. They love to experiment.I'm still not following here, I thought Wade was an opener? Why exactly did they get Ponting to open?
I think i said it when those comments were made after the first match too but then they said it was flexible and i thought they were just putting up a front to avoid saying someone has been dropped.If you disagree with the rotation policy, why the **** only come out and say it when Sachin is rested rather than when Gambhir was rested last game?
Can you imagine Clarke at 5? Nope? Well Forrest is at 4 so something needed to change to not have Clarke below 4.I'm still not following here, I thought Wade was an opener? Why exactly did they get Ponting to open?