Me too.I iz a citizen of the world. I was born in NZ though. Now i is in da land of the da rising sun.
By having batsmen congenitally unable to get into three figures, no clue who our best wicketkeeper is, a pace attack that's nearly as injured as yours, a spinner fond of long hops and a tail that is arguably the most fragile in world cricket. That's how.Me too.
I was in an internet cafe in Shibuya today and some guy was checking cricinfo...
And to make this on topic... How are England not gonna kill us in the Tests?
Merci.Abdul Kardar & Khalid Ibadulla. 249 @ Karachi vs Australia, 24 October 1964.
That's ok, the New Zealand batsman were struggling to get into double figures in South Africa let alone contemplating the thought of scoring a hundred. Can’t see anything less than a 2-0 for 'us' tbh.By having batsmen congenitally unable to get into three figures, no clue who our best wicketkeeper is, a pace attack that's nearly as injured as yours, a spinner fond of long hops and a tail that is arguably the most fragile in world cricket. That's how.
TBF Bangladesh didn't play a Test for over a year from April 2006 and while his domestic form hasn't been that great, he notched up three fifties just before the tour in an NCL competition that has been largely dominated by the bowlers. I think he's there more for his experience in a very, very inexperienced side, although the way he's batting he looks like the least experienced out there.Does Habibul Bashar deserve to be in the Test side? Hasn't scored a 50 since April of 2006 and I don't think he's made too many domestic runs either.
How is Rajin not already playing, though? He's your best batsman as of now from where I sit. His test averages hovers between 27 and 30 and his first class average is 35. He looked extremely assured technically against Australia - even moreso than Nafees even if he scored less runs than him. I just don't get his omission; he'd be the first batsman on the list for me. Habibul, Nafees as a middle order player and Aftab is all much of a muchness but Rajin should definitely be there.TBF Bangladesh didn't play a Test for over a year from April 2006 and while his domestic form hasn't been that great, he notched up three fifties just before the tour in an NCL competition that has been largely dominated by the bowlers. I think he's there more for his experience in a very, very inexperienced side, although the way he's batting he looks like the least experienced out there.
Agreed though, his time has passed. Someone else has to stand up now, ideally Rajin Saleh.
Especially in a seamer friendly place like NZ.How is Rajin not already playing, though? He's your best batsman as of now from where I sit. His test averages hovers between 27 and 30 and his first class average is 35. He looked extremely assured technically against Australia - even moreso than Nafees even if he scored less runs than him. I just don't get his omission; he'd be the first batsman on the list for me. Habibul, Nafees as a middle order player and Aftab is all much of a muchness but Rajin should definitely be there.
Was thinking the same thing myself, though Ian O'Brien dropping catches would be up there as well. Particularly when the batsman is Jaques Kallis.Is there anything worse in cricket than Ian O'Brien taking wickets?