How should have probably been preffered over Cumming IMO. McCullum shouldn't open in tests though. It just wouldn't work.I really cant beleive that how did not make it. Himself and McCullum have been the only 2 to consistantly put their hands up. Both have had a couple of failures, but you get that opening and also opening against Aussie.
What he did do, along with Astle, was be our most consistent and best runscorer for the majority of his international career.Who cares what he 'could do' its what he did do that counts.
Richardson always stood up - and if i remember correctly he has the best average for a kiwi opener. Prob the hardest job in the world given some of our pitches in the passt 10 years
His average is fairly mediocre (27ish) but thats far better than How and Papps who average in the teens. Given time, Cumming could average in the 30's.How should have probably been preffered over Cumming IMO. McCullum shouldn't open in tests though. It just wouldn't work.
Flem/Astle = consistancey???? what have you been smoking?What he did do, along with Astle, was be our most consistent and best runscorer for the majority of his international career.
Fleming and Astle were by far the most consistent and best batsmen we had in the 90's. If you question that then we seriously need to take a look at what you've been smoking.Flem/Astle = consistancey???? what have you been smoking?
No doubt, they were potentially the best, but they failed so often.
I dont think it is a coincidence that our best test results since the 90's have came when we had Richardson at the top.
Richardson didn't play a test in the 1990s. But to be fair to cbuts, he did say our best test results since the 1990s...
Yes, I don't agree with that decision either.Although it is good to see that they have relieved Mason of his 12th man duties and allowed him to go back to Central.NZ Bowling first. O'Brien picked over Mason which I don't agree with. Lets see if he can have any impact at all this match.
Harsh on the Deshis, one feels. I still think O'Brien is the 22nd best cricketer. I guess he might be better than Sajidul Islam, but I've only seen Sajidul bowl once so I'll give him the benefit of the doubt.Is this the first ever test where O'Brien isn't the 22nd best cricketer?