jcas0167
International Debutant
The difference is that Hamish Marshall is good enough for international cricket.Did you forget about Hamish Marshall in your list?
The difference is that Hamish Marshall is good enough for international cricket.Did you forget about Hamish Marshall in your list?
Not for 10 years, apparently.The difference is that Hamish Marshall is good enough for international cricket.
The more I think about it, the more I'd like to see Rutherford there or thereabouts in the T20 set-up. He's a natural T20 player, provides that left/right combo with Guppy up top & allows KW to better utilize overs 7-14 after the PP.I don't mind Latham being there, I just think our best all weather line up has Kane Williamson opening in ODI with Guptill, Latham could perform the "come in with an early wicket" role, or rotate with a hitter like Munro at 3 when it suits.
Eye surgery hasn't hindered Taylor on his return so far.
On NZ surfaces against Bangers, he'll probably be okay, but I think we saw enough in Australia to know against decent opposition he'll likely be cannon-fodder,de Grandhomme is barely a better bowler than Munro in T20 cricket really. If he's picked it should be as a specialist bat.
I'm fine with him playing as a specialist bat but it'll be carnage if he's expected to bowl in anything other than emergency.
Even in NZ domestic cricket he goes at nearly 10rpo and often plays without bowling at all. Admittedly I haven't seen him bowl this SuperSmash season and his figures seem a bit better than normal, and he has improved his bowling more generally as well, but I'd still just be considering him a batsman at this stage.On NZ surfaces against Bangers, he'll probably be okay, but I think we saw enough in Australia to know against decent opposition he'll likely be cannon-fodder,
With respect, Bangers T20 side in our conditions is probably slightly below the domestic T20 level that CDG faces, but you're straw-manning if you think I'm trying to argue he should be anywhere near bowling against any decent opposition, I'm def not.Even in NZ domestic cricket he goes at nearly 10rpo and often plays without bowling at all. Admittedly I haven't seen him bowl this SuperSmash season and his figures seem a bit better than normal, and he has improved his bowling more generally as well, but I'd still just be considering him a batsman at this stage.
CENTRAL STAGS vs AUCKLAND ACESGood signs, I don't think either game was televised, but it will be amazing news for us if his T20 hitting is even close to what it was circa 2008-12 in his glory slog-sweep days.
Great stuff. any other batsman & you wouldn't be so excited seeing slog-sweeps over mid wicket time and time again... but seeing that from Taylor is glorious, because you'd swear that was footage from 5 or so years ago.CENTRAL STAGS vs AUCKLAND ACES
You can see his boundaries here. Can't see how far the shots are going of course, but he seems to be hitting them pretty sweetly.
Make that 6 years. Was selected for Ireland in 2011 for a pre-World Cup tour to India, but ICC would only relax the stand-down period from 4 years to 3 years 10 months for Ed Joyce, and not Marshall, so Marshall had to be removed from the squad.Not for 10 years, apparently.
Good enough for Ireland squad ≠ international quality player. Just means he's one of the best available to a minnow who has international status.Make that 6 years. Was selected for Ireland in 2011 for a pre-World Cup tour to India, but ICC would only relax the stand-down period from 4 years to 3 years 10 months for Ed Joyce, and not Marshall, so Marshall had to be removed from the squad.
Then Marshall wasn't selected for Ireland later in 2011 due to funding issues between England, Ireland and Gloucestershire.
Ireland: Joyce cleared to represent Ireland at World Cup | Cricket | ESPN Cricinfo
Ireland news: Hamish Marshall's international future in jeopardy | Cricket | ESPN Cricinfo
So good enough for international cricket to at least 2011. Was a shame he didn't get a chance to play for Ireland and take on some test-nation attacks in white ball cricket.
Ruds never struck me as a natural t20 player. One side of the wicket player. Couldn't even leg glance.The more I think about it, the more I'd like to see Rutherford there or thereabouts in the T20 set-up. He's a natural T20 player, provides that left/right combo with Guppy up top & allows KW to better utilize overs 7-14 after the PP.
I thought he looked magnificent all around the wicket in the last game I saw, but it could be only at NZ domestic level.Ruds never struck me as a natural t20 player. One side of the wicket player. Couldn't even leg glance.
Players can change though. Maybe t20 bowling attacks force home to take a proper stance and not close off the leg side?
Nice six over mid-wicket here against England at 1.10 in a T20 at the Oval in 2013.Ruds never struck me as a natural t20 player. One side of the wicket player. Couldn't even leg glance.
Players can change though. Maybe t20 bowling attacks force home to take a proper stance and not close off the leg side?