FaaipDeOiad
Hall of Fame Member
Given it's a 9 letter word, it would be "overrated".
Congrats...it's actually over-rated. But, who am I to give spelling advice...FaaipDeOiad said:Given it's a 9 letter word, it would be "overrated".
I think that Lehmann being back fulltime would have been the "decent" batsman they so desperately needed.burkey_1988 said:They need decent batsmen desperately IMO
Plus Blewett getting out on the park regularly.SquidAU said:I think that Lehmann being back fulltime would have been the "decent" batsman they so desperately needed.
Yeah, I didn't forget him, just didn't think he needed a mention!vic_orthdox said:Plus Blewett getting out on the park regularly.
I rated Richards back in the day, but I thought his days were over. He and Jaques are the only real threat (batting wise) in that team. Haddin also if he has a good day.burkey_1988 said:Richards isn't that much of a shock to me really, though Murray Creed is a little unlucky not to be given a chance
(and Thornley)Mister Wright said:I rated Richards back in the day, but I thought his days were over. He and Jaques are the only real threat (batting wise) in that team. Haddin also if he has a good day.
The only thing Thornely will be threatening is the dressing room attendant.FaaipDeOiad said:(and Thornley)
No confirmation as yet, it could be too late to instigate it into the rules. However, I wouldn't be surprised if the super sub is added.burkey_1988 said:Are they playing Supersubs this season ?
Didn't they try something similar a few years ago? Having 12 players play?Mister Wright said:No confirmation as yet, it could be too late to instigate it into the rules. However, I wouldn't be surprised if the super sub is added.
Batting and bowling 12th men. It's a slightly different concept.SquidAU said:Didn't they try something similar a few years ago? Having 12 players play?
Or am I dreaming it?
It wasn't a supersub. Teams would name 12 players with 11 batting and 11 fielding. However technically 12 players could bowl. Different concept to that of a supersub where a player gets replaced.SquidAU said:Didn't they try something similar a few years ago? Having 12 players play?
Or am I dreaming it?
So...similar, but different?burkey_1988 said:12 players couldn't bowl, Kyle. 11 could bat and 11 could bowl, meaning one player would bowl but not be able to bat and another would bat but not be able to bowl.
Really? I'm pretty sure teams were able to rotate 12 players on the field no matter what. But, it was a long time ago.burkey_1988 said:12 players couldn't bowl, Kyle. 11 could bat and 11 could bowl, meaning one player would bowl but not be able to bat and another would bat but not be able to bowl.
I'd say they will be on t.v. at least radio. The final will definitely be shown.SquidAU said:So...similar, but different?
I wonder if there will be TV or radio coverage of the Twenty20 comp.....and if crowds even turn up to it....