At least Clarke can perform against weaker opposition. It has finally taken a grade-level side to show that Brad Hogg shouldn't be anywhere near the Australian squad.Gaijin-san said:Go Clarke you good thing, you.
105* off 102 balls. Damn fine innings. Maybe not against the greatest opposition, but I think its a breakthrough innings.
You're being a bit harsh. This Aussie team is a bit better than a grade-level side.Mister Wright said:At least Clarke can perform against weaker opposition. It has finally taken a grade-level side to show that Brad Hogg shouldn't be anywhere near the Australian squad.
Any innings of his would look good after his previous innings.Gaijin-san said:Well now I feel justified to rant a bit, given ole Clarkey's performance last night.
Maybe his hundred was made against Zimbabwe, but I know many of you would be saying he's even worse if he didn't make a hundred.
I thought it was a fairly good innings myself, showing his increasing maturity. He paced his first 50 brilliantly (68 balls), and then smashed his way to 100 when there were precious little runs left to get.
And, most telling of all, he didn't offer a chance. Not a single one.
Kasper got Taibu. Deserved more though.Craig said:I must say, in that innings was probably the best I have seen Kasprowicz bowl and not pick up a scalp.
Elton Chigumba (sp) looks like he might have some ability.
uhuh, about 400 ausdmarc71178 said:I assume that is $Zim?
Yeah, with all the tip-toeing by commentators, players and officials, that kinda forced in a little perspective on the whole thing.marc71178 said:Not quite so impressive then.
Was that even enough for a round for the team?!