Demolition Man
State Vice-Captain
Told you marto would come good, he really turned it around 2 innings ago. Graet to see him get the runs when his team and country needed him most.
The rule is optional, and is based on the number of wickets remaining. It is either 2 or 3, but it's a hard and fast rule, you can't get the half hour with 5 down just because you think you might win.Pratyush said:I always thought the rule was the bowling team can ask/get extra half hour as long as they feel they have a fiar chance of closing it out on the same day regardless of te wickets in hand.
Some one clarify the real rule please.
ha, nah i was reckoning he may have a sensational time with the ball in the next year like after 10 test he may have 50 wickets or something. But has James90 said he may just be a steady enough performer to stay in the teamdontcloseyoureyes said:Average over 100 in both forms? I can see it
Which completely contradicts what you've only just said and confirms what I said about it only being because 1 decision went against Australia...aussie said:i don't need to, obviously when he makes one that affects Australia i'm going to get annoyed thats normal.
Only Mick Lewis can do that...dontcloseyoureyes said:Average over 100 in both forms? I can see it
Anyone else think that he won't get his batting average back above 50 again before retirement?Tom Halsey said:Gilly first baller.
I don't think there's any hard and fast rule - I think the umpires have to agree that there is a reasonable chance of a result, taking everything into consideration.Dasa said:I think they'd have to be 8 wickets down to be able to claim the extra half hour.
Either side can ask for it, if they have a realistic chance of winning with a further 8 overs play.Pratyush said:I always thought the rule was the bowling team can ask/get extra half hour as long as they feel they have a fiar chance of closing it out on the same day regardless of te wickets in hand.
Some one clarify the real rule please.
No, James90 has never been a steady enough performer to stay in the team.aussie said:ha, nah i was reckoning he may have a sensational time with the ball in the next year like after 10 test he may have 50 wickets or something. But has James90 he may just be a steady enough performer to stay in the team
I do not think he will but he does have Bangladesh next week.marc71178 said:Anyone else think that he won't get his batting average back above 50 again before retirement?
Well he's not got too long left, so I can't see him getting anywhere near really (I know I'm going to regret saying this).marc71178 said:Anyone else think that he won't get his batting average back above 50 again before retirement?
Hard to say. His form in ODI cricket suggests he's not totally past it, so I'd say he could. He does seem to have a real problem with the ball moving away from him when a bowler comes around the wicket though, at least recently.marc71178 said:Anyone else think that he won't get his batting average back above 50 again before retirement?
i dont understand where you are going with this?marc71178 said:Which completely contradicts what you've only just said and confirms what I said about it only being because 1 decision went against Australia...
Not a hope in hell, expecialy with England visiting next Winter.marc71178 said:Anyone else think that he won't get his batting average back above 50 again before retirement?
And the chances of him getting a bat in those games?TT Boy said:I do not think he will but he does have Bangladesh next week.
Just proving my initial comments to be correct.aussie said:i dont understand where you are going with this?