True. Philander looked by far the most likely of the SA bowlers. And I was one of the guys expecting him to be terrible.Philander looked brilliant in his (I think) second spell
I feel like this is a really premature call. Warner may be Australia's version of QdK and if Smith does an Amla, suddenly RSA feel more confident particularly with Marsh walking to the crease.at the loss of only 4 wickets.Brutal stuff from Oz today, virtually killing off the contest. Innings victory on the cards at this rate.
The Steyn/Philander/Rabada were always going to play.. it was whether we played a 4th seamer and should it be Morkel/Abbott. I did not expect us to play a spinner at Perth....Yeah Abbott a bit stiff for this game, tbh. Bowling quite well right now, might have played over Philander.
SA are far from out of the match.... but if we bowl tomorrow morning like we did today we`re ****ed.I feel like this is a really premature call. Warner may be Australia's version of QdK and if Smith does an Amla, suddenly RSA feel more confident particularly with Marsh walking to the crease.at the loss of only 4 wickets.
Obviously we are well on top but we could easily undo that dominance in 1 session.
None of that is necessary. Today was objectively not boring.It struck me today that for all the talk from certain ex-players (Warne, Lehmann, Jones) that test cricket is becoming boring and change is needed, a large part of the problem - in Australia at least - is the lack of Lawry and Greig in commentary. When South Africa were falling like flies in the first hour or so, I couldn't help but think how Lawry would've been lapping it up and making it feel even more dramatic than it already was. He would've been sticking it to Greig as the icing on the cake. They really were two of a kind. I don't mind Mark Taylor as a commentator, but he just had nowhere near the same impact first up this morning.
The explanation that is usually given is that non Australian fast bowlers see the bounce and start trying to bounce the batsmen when a length ball is way more effective. It sounds stupid that international players would do this but SA did exactly that.Why can't Non Aussie bowlers shine at the WACA?
efaIt was like that even vs NZ. Faf doesn't like coming inat 4against good bowling. I'd prefer it if even Bavuma came in a t 4 tbh. Duminy is just... Urgghhh. Makes the lineup look so fragile.
Because it's probably the most alien venue in the world to bowl at. The pace and bounce at the WACA is pretty much unique.Why can't Non Aussie bowlers shine at the WACA?
Has done it 19 times since January 2015 apparently. Next best is Malinga with 7.And Starc's knack of first-over poles, I honestly can't think of any bowler I've ever seen or heard of who's so good at that. You, an opener walk out, still waking up, some bloke lopes into bowl like a high-jumper and rips down 150K's hooping balls. Nasty.
NoSouth Africa are so difficult to watch at times, because they don't use their intelligence. They should've opened to Warner with spin.
Yes.. but they must just bowl better.They are bowling to his strengths time and time again.