Probably that he wanted to keep the LHB RHB combo going.Before you sleep. you have to answer that
Very interesting indeed, particularly that Kumble took a significantly lower amount of matches than Pollock but at a far worse average. Shocked to see Pollock up there too in fact, was he really THAT good for the first 300 of his career?Harbhajan goes into the next Test needing just 1 more wicket to reach 300 Test wickets.
He will be the first player in the game to reach that mark with an average above 30.
The three players with the highest average as they approached the innings in which they got their 300th wicket are :-
- Kumble : 27.9 (65 Tests)
- Gibbs : 28.4 (74)
- Vaas : 28.8 (90)
- Kapil : 29.0 (83)
- Harbhajan : 30.0 (71)
Interesting to see all the three Indians who got 300 wickets in that list.
The best figures for a bowler at the doorstep of his 300th wicket are
- Pollock : 20.5 (73)
- Marshall : 20.9 (60)
- Trueman : 21.2 (64)
- McGrath 21.8 (63)
Hah ol' Aussie media on work again. Dhoni was signalling to third umpire than appealing the catch. Bull**** reporting from the media, but oh, by their standards this is pretty generous.Once again Aussie media is so generous in the praise
http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,24531402-2882,00.html
"....But the behaviour of some of the Indian players was a disgrace. And stand-in skipper M. S. Dhoni is at the top of the pile. How wicketkeeper Dhoni could appeal yesterday for an edge off Mitchell Johnson that clearly bounced before his gloves was bewildering.
Umpire Rudi Koertzen immediately rejected Zaheer Khan's appeal and should have had a stern talk with Dhoni...."
Once again Aussie media is so generous in the praise
http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,24531402-2882,00.html
"....But the behaviour of some of the Indian players was a disgrace. And stand-in skipper M. S. Dhoni is at the top of the pile. How wicketkeeper Dhoni could appeal yesterday for an edge off Mitchell Johnson that clearly bounced before his gloves was bewildering.
Umpire Rudi Koertzen immediately rejected Zaheer Khan's appeal and should have had a stern talk with Dhoni...."
Haha I've defended the little media snippets you've posted before, but that one really is poor and pretty damn bitter.Once again Aussie media is so generous in the praise
http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,24531402-2882,00.html
"....But the behaviour of some of the Indian players was a disgrace. And stand-in skipper M. S. Dhoni is at the top of the pile. How wicketkeeper Dhoni could appeal yesterday for an edge off Mitchell Johnson that clearly bounced before his gloves was bewildering.
Umpire Rudi Koertzen immediately rejected Zaheer Khan's appeal and should have had a stern talk with Dhoni...."
Yeah, indeed.height of absurdity.
Yeah. It really surprises me. All the more reason to think that had Polly retired just after 2004, he'd be hailed one of the greatest fast bowlers ever. (Of course, it wont happen, but just a thought). And his batting record also was god damn impressive then.Very interesting indeed, particularly that Kumble took a significantly lower amount of matches than Pollock but at a far worse average. Shocked to see Pollock up there too in fact, was he really THAT good for the first 300 of his career?
Pollock was criminally underrated for the majority of his career, in my opinion.Very interesting indeed, particularly that Kumble took a significantly lower amount of matches than Pollock but at a far worse average. Shocked to see Pollock up there too in fact, was he really THAT good for the first 300 of his career?
The Indians get the ball reversing around the 15 over mark. Just as the conventional swing from the new ball stops, the ball starts reversing around like mad.When the Indians had the pads on it was a docile batsmen’s paradise, but as Hayden and Katich strolled to the middle, the track suddenly turned into a ‘Gabba green top and a vicious, spitting, spinning Old Trafford deck all at once, before calming down again when the Indian batsmen returned to the crease.
It’s hardly fair, given that the Australians shun these crude tactics. When Australia is in the field the only time you see the ball move off the straight is during its gentle, curving trajectory on its way over the boundary.
http://blogs.theaustralian.news.com...an/comments/indians_dish_up_curry_to_aussies/Surely that kind of precocious talent needs a good, hard examination and there’s no better man for the job than Daryl Hair. If there’s a problem with Mishra’s action - and his figures in this test say there’s got to be - Hair will find it and have him dispatched to Perth, for a battery of tests before he’s allowed to return to the game with a strict warning if he ****s that elbow one more time, he’ll be on the first plane back to Perth to do it all over again.
Incomparable in drama, excitement, cloeseness of the contest, personnel on show, etc. Still promises to be a very intriguing one mind.This is shaping to be one cracker of a series. Possibly better than Ashes 05. I hope we win the next test to force a showdown.
1992-1993 IND v ZIM IND v ZIM 1st Test 13/03/1993 India Won by an Innings and 13 Runs
1996-1997 IND v AUS IND v AUS 1st Test 10/10/1996 India Won by 7 Wickets
1998-1999 IND v PAK IND v PAK 2nd Test 04/02/1999 India Won by 212 Runs
2000-2001 IND v ZIM IND v ZIM 1st Test 18/11/2000 India Won by 7 Wickets
2001-2002 IND v ZIM IND v ZIM 2nd Test 28/02/2002 India Won by 4 Wickets
2005-2006 IND v SRL IND v SRL 2nd Test 10/12/2005 India Won by 188 Runs
2007-2008 IND v PAK IND v PAK 1st Test 22/11/2007 India Won by 6 Wickets
How is that? A right hander (Sehwag) got out and another right hander (Dhoni) came in. To the best of my knowledge Sachin still bats right handed. Why couldn't he have come in place of Dhoni ?Probably that he wanted to keep the LHB RHB combo going.
Pollock is one of the finest and certainly the most under rated among the top-most pacers of the modern era.Very interesting indeed, particularly that Kumble took a significantly lower amount of matches than Pollock but at a far worse average. Shocked to see Pollock up there too in fact, was he really THAT good for the first 300 of his career?
I fail to see the point in your pushing this point. Dhoni has a better SR than Sachin, right?How is that? A right hander (Sehwag) got out and another right hander (Dhoni) came in. To the best of my knowledge Sachin still bats right handed. Why couldn't he have come in place of Dhoni ?
Oh yeah, I am yet to get from the hangover of a 10-hr blissful sleep.How is that? A right hander (Sehwag) got out and another right hander (Dhoni) came in. To the best of my knowledge Sachin still bats right handed. Why couldn't he have come in place of Dhoni ?