You never lose skill, your body just deterioratesDydl said:He could have lost a bit of skill in age
Even though he smokes, Warne is the fittest he's ever been.Dydl said:He could have lost a bit of skill in age, his performance might also be better if he stopped smoking. Murali might start to lose a bit of his touch as he ages but maybe not as much as Warne as he doesn't smoke.
That's been and gone.Mister Wright said:Haha! Warne won't get dropped. But he has not proved to me that he has what it takes to dominate India. I think Laxman will get fired up, he won't be too impressed getting out to Warne. Look for him to fire in the second innings.
Waughney said:That's been and gone.
Second Test match?
FRAZ said:You are reaching at 1000 , No matter if by bashing FRAZ
FRAZ said:Hey, Fraz is cool. Fraz no toruble, man those mongolians and ohyes India is frustrated coz Auz won, plz don't kill Dar..I fear his death and I enjoy posting when India does bad..
Ya, I think thats fair enough, and I am sure any other team also would have let their leggie do the same, for confidence as well as recordMister Wright said:It was Keith Stackpole, he said that the Australians can sometimes put the individual ahead of the team. He thought that Gilchrist was overbowling Warne and that it was just to go after the record and not really to wrap it up quickly. He said they should have won the match last night, they should have been more aggresive especially after having India 4-19, he said that what Warne was bowling this morning was some of the worst leg spin bowling he has ever seen and it was a case of Warne going after the record instead of giving the team an extra days rest and it was bad for Warne because he wasn't concerntrating on anything to do with his bowling (for example flight, turn, etc) but rather just getting the record.
He said Gilchrist's captaincy was far to complacent and he should have been more aggresive and wrapped it up earlier.
Thanks for that mate. That's exactly what my friend told me.Mister Wright said:It was Keith Stackpole, he said that the Australians can sometimes put the individual ahead of the team. He thought that Gilchrist was overbowling Warne and that it was just to go after the record and not really to wrap it up quickly. He said they should have won the match last night, they should have been more aggresive especially after having India 4-19, he said that what Warne was bowling this morning was some of the worst leg spin bowling he has ever seen and it was a case of Warne going after the record instead of giving the team an extra days rest and it was bad for Warne because he wasn't concerntrating on anything to do with his bowling (for example flight, turn, etc) but rather just getting the record.
He said Gilchrist's captaincy was far to complacent and he should have been more aggresive and wrapped it up earlier.
I don't think the Indian batsmen are underestimating Warne really. They just play him comfortably - even the tail were able to handle him well enough.Mr Casson said:I wouldn't worry about the Indians having confidence against Warne. Sure it might help them, but I think it might help him even more being underestimated.
I agree. There is no question of undersetimating him but it was not a performance befitting a bowler of his status and it doesnt look as if he is going to fare differently on this tour than the earlier ones.Dasa said:I don't think the Indian batsmen are underestimating Warne really. They just play him comfortably - even the tail were able to handle him well enough.
And how right they are...Murky off-field, clumsy on it
I agree with that. Harbhajan tends to stick to over the wicket far too much IMO...Arjun said:Boycott said that Harbhajan was not bowling enough round the wicket. He may have had a point, since the offie was giving too much room coming over the wicket. Maybe he had changed that in the second innings. More video analysis for the team.
Tell that to Laxman who was out in both innings to him :PDasa said:I don't think the Indian batsmen are underestimating Warne really. They just play him comfortably - even the tail were able to handle him well enough.
They're not going to improve their chances of winning by playing defensively, while their opposition are going great guns and smashing their bowlers around the park. The Indians have to respond by attacking the Aussie bowlers, but should be more effective and thoughtful. McGrath is tough, and you should take what you get, but the Indians shouldn't let the others get the better of them. Coem to think of it, the Indian bowlers shouldn't give away too many runs an over, either.India has to be vigilant against every one of Australia's specalist bowlers. That has what has made the Australian bowling attack so fearsome over the last five years, you really don't have a bowler you can smash around at will. Even Warne only conceded at 3.5 runs an over when he was bowling shockingly in the 2nd innings.