• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* Australia in India 2010

vcs

Request Your Custom Title Now!
So Johnson's inswinger would actually be the delivery that goes away from the left-hander, right? So isn't it actually an outswinger? :unsure:
 

Ruckus

International Captain
The Seinfeld inspired 'bizarro world' team:

Hughes,
Watson,
Clarke (C),
Ponting (VC),
David Hussey,
Katich,
Paine,
Smith,
Starc,
Siddle,
Harris

I wonder how it would do?

Disclaimer: Not intended to be taken seriously.
 

morgieb

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Does an Aussie player have to fail in an Ashes series to get dropped? Katich, Martyn, Gillespie & Hughes all got the arse after much shorter periods of mediocrity than North's turned out.

His offies are ok and all, but come on...
Seems like it.

I hope that North fails this Ashes then.
 

andyc

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
So Johnson's inswinger would actually be the delivery that goes away from the left-hander, right? So isn't it actually an outswinger? :unsure:
Yeah, have always wondered whether a ball that a left-armer bowls that moves from left to right is called an inswinger or an outswinger? That is, just as a left arm spinner is SLA/Chinaman, is it different for a left arm paceman?
 

Jayzamann

International Regular
I can seriously see a discussion in years to come after Hilditch is committed where we wonder how he could have made it to the head of the selection panel.
 
Last edited:

Stapel

International Regular
I was just reading an article on Rickey Ponting, saying he thought Bollinger not bowling the overs he usually does, was a big difference. He stated it would have been nice to have another quick to turn to.

Yet, Watson only got 6 overs in the 1st and 2 overs in the 2nd innings. Not saying Watto is a proper quick, but I feel he was underused!

Any thoughts?
 

sifter132

School Boy/Girl Cricketer
Does an Aussie player have to fail in an Ashes series to get dropped? Katich, Martyn, Gillespie & Hughes all got the arse after much shorter periods of mediocrity than North's turned out.

His offies are ok and all, but come on...
I think it's just that most of the longer term planning is Ashes planning. So when the series is over it's a good time to make changes because there isn't an important series for a while. If North had have been crap in the '09 Ashes, I'm almost certain he wouldn't be in the XI anymore.
 

andyc

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
I was just reading an article on Rickey Ponting, saying he thought Bollinger not bowling the overs he usually does, was a big difference. He stated it would have been nice to have another quick to turn to.

Yet, Watson only got 6 overs in the 1st and 2 overs in the 2nd innings. Not saying Watto is a proper quick, but I feel he was underused!

Any thoughts?
I didn't see any of his bowling in the second innings, but from what I saw in the first innings, he definitely wasn't bowling at full pace. Reckon he was still a bit stiff from his century, and his 50 in the second dig wouldn't have exactly helped him recover.
 

vic_orthdox

Global Moderator
So Johnson's inswinger would actually be the delivery that goes away from the left-hander, right? So isn't it actually an outswinger? :unsure:
Nah, you just call it an inswinger. Everything revolves around right handed batsmen.

Put it this way, if Johnson was just doing some work bowling at a set of cones and not a batsman, he'd just be referring to it as his inswinger.
 

vcs

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Nah, you just call it an inswinger. Everything revolves around right handed batsmen.

Put it this way, if Johnson was just doing some work bowling at a set of cones and not a batsman, he'd just be referring to it as his inswinger.
Ah, OK. Thanks. :)
 

social

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
I was just reading an article on Rickey Ponting, saying he thought Bollinger not bowling the overs he usually does, was a big difference. He stated it would have been nice to have another quick to turn to.

Yet, Watson only got 6 overs in the 1st and 2 overs in the 2nd innings. Not saying Watto is a proper quick, but I feel he was underused!

Any thoughts?
Looked stiff as a board when he did bowl so probably wasnt 100% fit
 

GotSpin

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
I was just reading an article on Rickey Ponting, saying he thought Bollinger not bowling the overs he usually does, was a big difference. He stated it would have been nice to have another quick to turn to.

Yet, Watson only got 6 overs in the 1st and 2 overs in the 2nd innings. Not saying Watto is a proper quick, but I feel he was underused!

Any thoughts?
Watto looked really tired. Wasn't up to bowling at all
 

robelinda

International Vice-Captain
Watson looked absolutely cooked. Or he was just really trying to move the ball and not rely on pace. The way he bowled in the UK vs Pakistan was good enough. Watto, more of that please!
 

sachin200

U19 12th Man
Andrew Hilditch on Marcus North


"No player is safe in international cricket, you've got to perform,'' Hilditch told Sydney Morning Herald. ''What we do know is that he [North] was in excellent form in the tour game, he's scored hundreds at international level, he's scored hundreds against England. He is a very classy player. He'd be disappointed he failed, like any other player."

:laughing:

Cricinfo comment

Posted by Davo47 on (October 06 2010, 21:08 PM GMT)

North and Hauritz are passengers - so is Hilditch. We all know why Hauritz got so many wickets in the Sydney test, and North's form has been heading south for too long now.
 
Last edited:

Top