GotSpin
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Yeah I guess. It's got to be the most devastating weapon for a left handed bowler who has a natural slant away from a right handed batsmenIf he gets seaming conditions like he did in SA 09, he will.
Yeah I guess. It's got to be the most devastating weapon for a left handed bowler who has a natural slant away from a right handed batsmenIf he gets seaming conditions like he did in SA 09, he will.
Seems like it.Does an Aussie player have to fail in an Ashes series to get dropped? Katich, Martyn, Gillespie & Hughes all got the arse after much shorter periods of mediocrity than North's turned out.
His offies are ok and all, but come on...
Yeah, have always wondered whether a ball that a left-armer bowls that moves from left to right is called an inswinger or an outswinger? That is, just as a left arm spinner is SLA/Chinaman, is it different for a left arm paceman?So Johnson's inswinger would actually be the delivery that goes away from the left-hander, right? So isn't it actually an outswinger?
I think it's just that most of the longer term planning is Ashes planning. So when the series is over it's a good time to make changes because there isn't an important series for a while. If North had have been crap in the '09 Ashes, I'm almost certain he wouldn't be in the XI anymore.Does an Aussie player have to fail in an Ashes series to get dropped? Katich, Martyn, Gillespie & Hughes all got the arse after much shorter periods of mediocrity than North's turned out.
His offies are ok and all, but come on...
I didn't see any of his bowling in the second innings, but from what I saw in the first innings, he definitely wasn't bowling at full pace. Reckon he was still a bit stiff from his century, and his 50 in the second dig wouldn't have exactly helped him recover.I was just reading an article on Rickey Ponting, saying he thought Bollinger not bowling the overs he usually does, was a big difference. He stated it would have been nice to have another quick to turn to.
Yet, Watson only got 6 overs in the 1st and 2 overs in the 2nd innings. Not saying Watto is a proper quick, but I feel he was underused!
Any thoughts?
Nah, you just call it an inswinger. Everything revolves around right handed batsmen.So Johnson's inswinger would actually be the delivery that goes away from the left-hander, right? So isn't it actually an outswinger?
Ah, OK. Thanks.Nah, you just call it an inswinger. Everything revolves around right handed batsmen.
Put it this way, if Johnson was just doing some work bowling at a set of cones and not a batsman, he'd just be referring to it as his inswinger.
Looked stiff as a board when he did bowl so probably wasnt 100% fitI was just reading an article on Rickey Ponting, saying he thought Bollinger not bowling the overs he usually does, was a big difference. He stated it would have been nice to have another quick to turn to.
Yet, Watson only got 6 overs in the 1st and 2 overs in the 2nd innings. Not saying Watto is a proper quick, but I feel he was underused!
Any thoughts?
Watto looked really tired. Wasn't up to bowling at allI was just reading an article on Rickey Ponting, saying he thought Bollinger not bowling the overs he usually does, was a big difference. He stated it would have been nice to have another quick to turn to.
Yet, Watson only got 6 overs in the 1st and 2 overs in the 2nd innings. Not saying Watto is a proper quick, but I feel he was underused!
Any thoughts?
9<16 last time I checked TBH.Hey Sachin200
Nadal > Federer
Also welcome to CricketWeb