andyc
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Had a lot of trouble figuring out that camera, thoughmarc71178 said:I disagree - he carried the drinks well at Trent Bridge - didn't spill a drop!
Had a lot of trouble figuring out that camera, thoughmarc71178 said:I disagree - he carried the drinks well at Trent Bridge - didn't spill a drop!
Agreed on all counts, especially as Langer was in the 90's by then. IIRC 8 of the runs were edges through or over the slips.marc71178 said:I'd add in the Harmison over to Langer personally - yes it went for 11 runs or so with 2 boundaries, but the speed he had and everything was what was missing from his bowling for the rest of the series.
I agree with you 100%. It is one of the reasons I have always felt Kumble is not as bad away from home as made out to be. True, he doesn't take too many wickets, but he does keep it reasonably tight and invariably, it is the lack of penetration in the seam attack that has led to India leaking too many runs overseas.greg said:I guess for the same reason that Lee only really ran in at full pace when the match was almost over with him in his final spell. Fast bowlers have to reign themselves in if they are too last the whole match and bowl their fair share of overs.
BTW Harmison reminds me a bit of Ambrose (NOTE: this is just an illustrative example, not a proper comparison of their respective achievements or abilities) at the end of his career who would often struggle to take wickets on flat wickets, but maintained his average by 1) being incredibly miserly with his economy rate, so he could have a pretty poor strike rate but maintain his average 2) when the conditions were in his favour (this is most relevant to Harmison) taking full advantage with some big wicket hauls running through the opposition. Had Harmison had one more helpful pitch in the series then we would have probably been talking about him as England's most important bowler. Personally I am happy having him in the team as long as he continues to keep it tight on pitches not in his favour (something which was obviously NOT the case in South Africa). That is the advantage of a five man attack. As long as they are not a liability and can bowl their fair share of overs without causing damage when conditions are not in their favour, but capitalising when they are, then they will always be a worth their place in the team. The variety in the attack is what guarantees we should be able to take wickets in most conditions.
Economy rate is a much ignored factor when comparing why certain bowlers have significantly better averages than others. One of the main reasons why Harmison's and Flintoff's averages in this series were even close was because of the enormous no.of noballs that Freddie bowled - adding at least 3 ticks to his average.
Strauss perhaps?Tom Halsey said:Catch of the series - Trauss, who else?
geraint's reflex catch wasnt too bad either.Barney Rubble said:Catch of the series - No doubt in my mind, Strauss at Trent Bridge to get Gilchrist. The "Superman cape" description given by Slats really seemed to fit.
Jamee999 said:Strauss perhaps?
The one on the final evening at OT to dismiss Warne? That was fantastic, actually, I forgot that one. And thank God he caught it, because the preceding drop by Strauss was an absolute shocker.tooextracool said:geraint's reflex catch wasnt too bad either.
That was at Old Traffordandyc said:Well, for me, Lords was the best
But on which test had the best cricket, Edgbaston for sure. When Warnie got out on 90, I was so gutted for him.
Barney Rubble said:Ball of the series - Harmison's slower ball to Clarke at Edgbaston.
Oh it was, wasn't it? My bad.greg said:That was at Old Trafford
That still sends shivers up my spine thinking about that over. The best test cricket feeling along with the Harmison ball. I never realised how good a ball it was until seeing it a few days ago, but it was one of those moments where you knew something was going to happen. Utter genius.Top_Cat said:. After wrenching his shoulder whilst batting and subsequently belting the Aussies to all parts, he came on and after getting Langer second-ball, the next three were super-fast and viciously cutting in. Absolutely pinned Ponting on the crease. Awesome bowling. Then, last ball, he bowled Ponting a perfectly-pitched QUICK away-swinger and Ponting, mentally shot by that stage, could only edge it behind. That, for me, was the best ball (including the lead-up to it), in the best over and was, for me, the best moment of the series. It surely does not get any better.
.
Hadn't they already done that to not send Kaspa back 20 runs before the end?jlo33692 said:ooohhhhh if only jones had misfielded or the umpires made one of their customary blunders hahaha