Is this coat yours?chalky said:You could say he's been captain dissa-ponting
what modern school doesnt?Pratyush said:The archbishop tennyson school guys have a television on in school!
Pratyush said:Exactly! Saving face would be only possible if Australia can retain the Ashes. So if even 8 an over would be required in an extreme scenario, Australia would certainly go for it.
In the class room during study hours watching cricket? Certainly even surprised Hussain in the sky commentary.kwek said:what modern school doesnt?
do you think they study while cricket ?Pratyush said:In the class room during study hours watching cricket? Certainly even surprised Hussain in the sky commentary.
According to me its more likely England will not bat the next 20 overs as opposed to England will bat those overs.Knopfler said:Eight an over being required is not an extreme scenario.
Um. Yes.Pratyush said:Usually saving face means playing or a draw. But Australia's face would not be saved in that scenario here. So they would obviously go for saving their faces. But for doing that, they would have to go for a victory and not a draw.
Like I said a long time ago.... "South Africa wins the Ashes!"Slow Love™ said:First century for Pietersen - BIG innngs in the context of the match, as others around him succumbed to the pressure.
Mind you, the drops didn't hurt though.
When?Slow Love™ said:Oh, come on, mate. At the very least, you could acknowledge that he has done, as honestbharani said, "reasonably well".
Imagine if the poms dropped gilly as often as that.Slow Love™ said:First century for Pietersen - BIG innngs in the context of the match, as others around him succumbed to the pressure.
Mind you, the drops didn't hurt though.