He should look fairly comfortable for the first 5 overs while the lacquer is on, then if it swings like the ball has done this morning I can't see him lasting long.FaaipDeOiad said:I dunno... a start and then he'll get out to Flintoff. 30 maybe.
I certainly don't think they're cheating or anything of the sort, and some of the errors are understandable, but if the batsman swings and the only possible thing it could have hit was the bat and there's a noise and every single fielder goes up... there's no real excuse for that.social said:Dont blame Ponting for going off there.
At some point these umpires have to be made accountable for the no. of errors they're making.
If too old or incompetent, sack them. Dont simply be satisfied that theyre not cheating because theyre neutral.
Well, the problem with this whole debate has always been it's parochial nature. When the Aussies were getting the benefit of decisions against Pakistan and NZ, the Aussie supporters were all "oh shut up and get over it". Or "it all evens out in the end". Now, the Australians are complaining and the Poms are all "oh shut up and get over it". Whomever suffers it complains, and whomever benefits thinks it's all imaginary. And as we can see from the Aussies, these hats can change pretty quickly.Nnanden said:Interesting to see the English always quiet when this is going on.
Apart from further incorporation of technology (which is probably inevitable), we really need a bigger pool of umpires in the international panel. Because without that, there just aren't enough umpires around for umpires like Bucknor, Koetzen etc to be temporarily demoted, let alone sacked.social said:Dont blame Ponting for going off there.
At some point these umpires have to be made accountable for the no. of errors they're making.
If too old or incompetent, sack them. Dont simply be satisfied that theyre not cheating because theyre neutral.
I don't really think that's fair. I tell people to shut up and get over it when they pretend it's some sort of gigantic conspiricy against their country/in favour of a country they don't like, or when they accuse the umpires of cheating. Saying "oh that was a terrible decision" is completely fine as far as I'm concerned, even though yes they do tend to even out in the end. Australia have had the worst of the umpiring calls in this series by a fair margin, and there's no real problem with pointing that out.Slow Love™ said:Well, the problem with this whole debate has always been it's parochial nature. When the Aussies were getting the benefit of decisions against Pakistan and NZ, the Aussie supporters were all "oh shut up and get over it". Or "it all evens out in the end". Now, the Australians are complaining and the Poms are all "oh shut up and get over it". Whomever suffers it complains, and whomever benefits thinks it's all imaginary. And as we can see from the Aussies, these hats can change pretty quickly.
When we can get past all this and acknowledge that the technology has reached the point that it's becoming intolerable to put up with these kinds of mistakes, whoever benefits, we might see a more reasonable perspective.