FaaipDeOiad
Hall of Fame Member
Bit of reverse for Tait, Jack is quite right. If he keeps getting it to go and a wicket falls soon, it could be really tough for Collingwood and Jones coming in facing that.
I'm tipping Tony Greig to mention it in about 4 overs time. After referring to it as movement off the seam three times before that.FaaipDeOiad said:Bit of reverse for Tait, Jack is quite right. If he keeps getting it to go and a wicket falls soon, it could be really tough for Collingwood and Jones coming in facing that.
Cricinfo said:53.6 Katich to Flintoff, two runs, fullish and outside the off, heaved
through square leg for a single
I love that whole area - and what endears me to the people is a carefree, 'no worries' attitude that almost makes you Aussie in your outlook.chalky said:Nothing wrong with Hartlepool
Hey, I lived in Surrey for 3 years.luckyeddie said:I love that whole area - and what endears me to the people is a carefree, 'no worries' attitude that almost makes you Aussie in your outlook.
I reckon S_P must have been born in Surrey and moved there.
Yes, but Tait and Lee were bowling tripe, and McGrath was on at the other end, so it wasn't that hard a choice.Knopfler said:If im correct (im not far off) Warne came on in the 12th over. For the first innings of a test on a belter, that is pretty extraordinary. Im not saying it was a hard decision, just a very uncommon one.
Obviously haven't bumped into any football fans then.luckyeddie said:I love that whole area - and what endears me to the people is a carefree, 'no worries' attitude that almost makes you Aussie in your outlook.
I reckon S_P must have been born in Surrey and moved there.
Today is a lot harder to do something like that, because he's bowling a lot quicker with a lot more overspin. But in essence, yes. The English's problem with using their feet, as described in what you've posted, is that it always has to be an ultra-attacking move, a way of hitting a boundary, as opposed to just disturbing his length and pushing for a single.honestbharani said:Well, they never use their feet against him. They try to play him off the back foot, which is a huge risk if you cannot pick him off his hand. To play great spinners well, you need to use your feet. Like Warney bowling one googly can sow doubts into the batters' heads, a batter using his feet even once can sow doubts into Warney's heads. And it is not like everytime u use ur feet, u have to tonk him for 6. Use your feet to get to the pitch of the ball and the single becomes so much easier. Also, u can drive more freely as well as you are negating the turn. And once that happens, you can also start to put doubts into his head by plonking your front foot down, giving him the impression that u are gonna come down the track. He will then drag it down, and if you are good enough, u can go back after that and cut or pull the ball. I cannot believe the Englishmen are so hopeless against him. The way they play him, he looks like getting a wicket every ball. Paul Allott hit the nail on the head, I think. No one is going to stop him from getting wickets, but what you can do is make sure you get a lot of runs in between those wickets, not necessarily in 4s and 6s, but even in 1s and 2s.
Well, no-one can ever accuse you of being a pessimist - you're always convinced that the Aussies will come good in the next session, so it must be a specific bit of Surrey.social said:Hey, I lived in Surrey for 3 years.
Dont tar my home away from home with that brush.
No, dumb would've been to weaken the batting any further when it is already looking shaky.social said:Katich bowling.
MacGill anyone? **** Aus selectors are dumb.
If they can use their feet to McGrath, surely they can do it to Warne, however quick he may be bowling.vic_orthdox said:Today is a lot harder to do something like that, because he's bowling a lot quicker with a lot more overspin. But in essence, yes. The English's problem with using their feet, as described in what you've posted, is that it always has to be an ultra-attacking move, a way of hitting a boundary, as opposed to just disturbing his length and pushing for a single.
If a supposedly world-class batting line-up cant score runs against Harmy, Hoggard, Flintoff and Giles then .......marc71178 said:No, dumb would've been to weaken the batting any further when it is already looking shaky.
That was me, and I'm the same. Even the way he lifts his head triumphantly as he speaks... Baldrick all the way.Slow Love™ said:LOL, who was it that said that Goochy talked and looked just like Baldrick from Blackadder in those Advanced Hair ads? It haunts me every time I see it now...
What is everyone's view of Flintoff as a Test number 6 now?social said:Flintoff is always dangerous.
Well the evidence of the first 4 Tests suggests that they're struggling to do so.social said:If a supposedly world-class batting line-up cant score runs against Harmy, Hoggard, Flintoff and Giles then .......
Only those from Darlington, Hartlepool and Middlesbrough on a regular basis last year. They did reckon in Redcar that the Newkybroons and the Sunnerlund fans were a bit morbid, but only the kids.Scaly piscine said:Obviously haven't bumped into any football fans then.