andyc
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
i think ill just stick with ODIs and testsFaaipDeOiad said:I know.
i think ill just stick with ODIs and testsFaaipDeOiad said:I know.
They were confused with who got out. It was Strauss, not Collingwood.Arjun said:IS the scorecard on CricInfo going back and forth? First it was 156/5, then it was 156/6, with Gillespie getting the wicket of Collingwood (32) at 18.2 overs, then 156/5 and Collingwood at 33, then 158/5 at 18.1 and Collingwood at 34. Looks like they're replaying the over.
Replace 18.4 with 19.4 and I think you're spot on.superkingdave said:Hmm, decent effort by England considering, but i think we'll struggle without a spinner, need early wickets me thinks. I reckon Australia 183-3 in 18.4, lets hope im wrong
Low.BoyBrumby said:What odds on KP having a bowl?!
Fifteen minutes.andyc said:how long are the innings breaks?? something absurdly (but thankfully) short, im sure
hey, 4000 up hakon, nicely done.Samuel_Vimes said:They were confused with who got out. It was Strauss, not Collingwood.
Listen on BBC and don't get the confusion
Maybe you can try this: http://proxy.guardster.com ...Enter the bbc site address in the Free Anonymous Surfing field. I used to use this when my Univ blocked site addresses which contained the word 'cricket'. Yours is probably more sophisticated, but you can try.andyc said:yep, its blocked
They're supposed to be back in about five minutes. Australia overshot their time limit by five mins or so, so they probably won't get much of a break at all.andyc said:how long are the innings breaks?? something absurdly (but thankfully) short, im sure